ArticlePloS one2025
A feedback queueing network model for traffic signal control at intersections considering congestion propagation in dynamic stochastic environments.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Capturing congestion propagation among different facilities at intersections in dynamic stochastic traffic environments poses significant challenges, particularly under oversaturated conditions. In this paper, we present an [Formula: see text] feedback fluid queueing network model to address CPDSE, integrating random traffic demand, time-varying transition probabilities, and state-dependent stochastic service capabilities. A recursive algorithm is developed to analyze the feedback queueing network model. Simulation experiments reveal that the proposed model and algorithm perform effectively, irrespective of variations in traffic intensity. Compared to the mean results of 200 simulations, the average absolute error is 0.5152 vehicles, and the average relative error is 6.43% across three demand scenarios. Based on the proposed feedback queueing network model, two optimization frameworks are established for traffic signal control, aimed at minimizing either the average vehicle delay time or total costs, including fuel consumption. We propose a rolling optimization strategy that incorporates the mesh adaptive direct search algorithm to achieve real-time traffic signal control. Numerical experiments using actual survey data from Kunshan City yield several noteworthy findings: (1) An optimal moderate-sized time step exists for rolling optimization to minimize either the average delay time or total costs; specifically, an excessively small time step may increase vehicle average delay time or total costs; (2) The percentage of delay reduction achieved by our method, compared to Synchro software, reaches a maximum of approximately 70% when traffic demand is moderate and the initial state is low; and (3) The percentage reduction in average delay or total costs compared to Synchro initially increases and then decreases with rising traffic intensity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.