ArticlePloS one2025
Geographic variability of floating kelp recovery after a marine heatwave event in the Salish Sea and adjacent open coast.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Floating canopy kelps, foundational species that support productive nearshore marine forests, are threatened by increasingly common and severe marine heatwaves (MHW). We tracked annual changes in kelp canopies and sea surface temperature (SST) before, during, and after the 2014-2016 MHW from the open coast of Washington State, USA into the Salish Sea. We found spatial differences in kelp canopy recovery timelines and in warming magnitude and duration. Estuarine-dominated sub-regions experienced slower recovery (up to three years) than ocean-driven areas (one year), even though all sub-regions experienced coincident declines. Mean SST of the warmest month was the most common predictor of annual canopy abundance (4 of 6 sub-regions), and the best predictor in the two exposed coast sub-regions, while anomaly magnitude and duration were the best predictors in the two innermost sub-regions. These results suggest that there may be substantive differences in kelp stressors and their interactions between estuarine- and oceanic-dominated nearshore ecosystems. However, while statistically significant, these associations were weak, emphasizing the need to understand effects of MHW on canopy kelp in the context of multiple interacting drivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.