ArticleeLife2025
MorphoNet 2.0: An innovative approach for qualitative assessment and segmentation curation of large-scale 3D time-lapse imaging datasets.
Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Thanks to recent promising advances in AI, automated segmentation of imaging datasets has made significant strides. However, the evaluation and curation of 3D and 3D+t datasets remain extremely challenging and highly resource-intensive. We present MorphoNet 2.0, a major conceptual and technical evolution designed to facilitate the segmentation, self-evaluation, and correction of 3D images. The application is accessible to non-programming biologists through user-friendly graphical interfaces and works on all major operating systems. We showcase its power in enhancing segmentation accuracy and boosting interpretability across five previously published segmented datasets. This new approach is crucial for producing ground-truth datasets of discovery-level scientific quality, critical for training and benchmarking advanced AI-driven segmentation tools, as well as for competitive challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.