ReviewPhysiological research2025
False-Positive Cardiac Troponin Elevations in Skeletal Muscle Disease: Clinical Relevance, Mechanisms, and Laboratory Approaches.
Review in Physiological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Case Report: Discordant high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T elevation in polymyositis: a diagnostic pitfall.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac troponins are indispensable biomarkers for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, but false-positive elevations that contradict the clinical picture remain a significant challenge in laboratory medicine. Analytical interferences may arise from macrotroponins, heterophile or anti-troponin antibodies, and the limited cardiac specificity of high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-cTnT) in skeletal muscle disease. Recent studies show that hs-cTnT is elevated in up to two-thirds of patients with myopathies, while high-sensitivity troponin I (hs-cTnI) is largely unaffected, underscoring the diagnostic advantage of hs-cTnI in this setting. A pragmatic diagnostic approach should combine clinical plausibility with stepwise laboratory testing. First, preanalytical factors such as sample mislabeling, fibrin clots, or hemolysis must be excluded and the measurement repeated. If the results remain incongruent, an alternative assay - ideally hs-cTnI - should be performed. Further evaluation may include heterophile-blocking reagents, polyethylene glycol precipitation to screen for macro-analytes, and, where available, confirmatory techniques such as gel filtration chromatography or immunoglobulin depletion (protein A/G). Although these strategies can help identify assay interference, there is no universally accepted gold standard. Awareness of false-positive elevations, careful interpretation of discordant troponin results, and effective collaboration between laboratories and clinicians are essential to prevent misdiagnosis and unnecessary interventions. Clear documentation of confirmed interferences further ensures safe patient management and provides guidance on which assays are reliable for future tests. Key words Cardiac troponin " Skeletal muscle disease " False-positive results " Analytical interference " Macrotroponin " Laboratory diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41329544PMC12746863What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.