ArticleJAMA network open2025
Surgical Low-Value Care Between Fee-For-Service and Salaried Health Care Systems.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Low-value care has been recognized as a pernicious phenomenon that increases health care costs and contributes to suboptimal care delivery. Low-value surgery may be less likely in systems that used salaried reimbursement as opposed to fee-for-service. Objective: To explore the association of reimbursement model with low-value surgery among a battery of elective procedures. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used TRICARE health care claims to compare rates of low-value surgery over fiscal years 2016 to 2023. Participants included patients aged 10 years and older who underwent acromioplasty, partial knee meniscectomy, shoulder rotator cuff repair, wrist arthroscopy, or ankle arthroscopy. Data were analyzed from January to May 2025. Exposure: Direct vs private sector care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the comparison of low-value care in patients in direct care vs private-sector care. An interaction between environment of care and year of surgery was retained in all models. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to adjust for case mix. Secondary analyses were limited to non-active-duty individuals to account for differences in low-value care for each surgical procedure. Results: A total of 304 908 procedures were included. The mean (SD) patient age was 47.2 (12.9) years, with 189 648 (62%) male patients. Partial meniscectomy was the most common surgical procedure (128 363 procedures [42%]), followed by acromioplasty (87 721 procedures [29%]). The percentage of low-value surgery in direct care was 20%, compared with 35% in the private-sector (χ22,304 908 = 90007.01; P < .001). After adjusting for case mix, the private sector demonstrated significantly greater odds of low-value surgery (odds ratio [OR], 1.41; 95% CI, 1.38-1.45). Low-value surgery was significantly lower in each respective sector for 2020 to 2023 compared with 2016 to 2019 (direct care: OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.73-0.83; private sector: OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.91-0.96). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of 304 908 surgical procedures, direct care evinced a significantly lower likelihood of low-value surgery in both 2016 to 2019 and 2020 to 2023. These findings support the contention that changing clinician reimbursement models from fee-for-service to salaried is associated with lower rates of low-value care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.