ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025
Latent profile analysis of return-to-work readiness and self-efficacy among breast cancer survivors who have not returned to work post-surgery.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo identify latent subgroups of return-to-work readiness (RRTW) and self-efficacy (RTW-SE) in postoperative patients with breast cancer who had not resumed employment and to examine predictors of subgroup membership.
methodsUsing convenience sampling, 323 postoperative patients with breast cancer who had not returned to work were recruited from a tertiary hospital in Sichuan Province, China. Latent profile analysis was conducted to examine heterogeneity in RRTW and RTW-SE scores.
resultsTwo subgroups were identified: a low readiness/low self-efficacy group (33.1%) and a high readiness/high self-efficacy group (66.9%). Scores on all RRTW dimensions, except pre-contemplation and RTW-SE, were higher in the high readiness group than in the low readiness group. Logistic regression showed that having a bachelor's or higher degree (odds ratio [OR] = 4.959), return-to-work intention (OR = 5.545), and not cohabitating with a spouse (OR = 2.305) were significantly associated with subgroup membership.
conclusionsOur findings highlight the need for stratified interventions, such as cognitive support, enhanced social resources, and personalized rehabilitation, to help patients transition from the "patient role" to the "occupational role." IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Tailored return-to-work support is needed for breast cancer survivors. Interventions should address individual differences in readiness and self-efficacy through cognitive-behavioral strategies, targeted counseling, and strengthened social support. Collaborative efforts between healthcare providers and employers are essential to develop personalized plans that bridge the gap between recovery, intention, and sustainable workforce reintegration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41329458What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.