Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41329386›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2025

Gut microbiota profile, potential engineering techniques and its genetic and epigenetic implications in poultry health.

Nuruliarizki Shinta Pandupuspitasari, Sugiharto Sugiharto, Faheem Ahmed Khan, Muhammad Asif Raza, Dela Ayu Lestari, Asep Setiaji, Ikania Agusetyaningsih

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nuruliarizki Shinta PandupuspitasariAnimal Science Department, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 50275, Indonesia. shin_tse@yahoo.com.
Sugiharto SugihartoAnimal Science Department, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 50275, Indonesia.
Faheem Ahmed KhanStem Cell and Cancer Research, Semarang, 50112, Indonesia.
Muhammad Asif RazaFaculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, MNS University of Agriculture, Multan, 66000, Pakistan.
Dela Ayu LestariAnimal Science Department, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 50275, Indonesia.
Asep SetiajiAnimal Science Department, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 50275, Indonesia.
Ikania AgusetyaningsihAnimal Science Department, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 50275, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poultry-derived meat and eggs represent economically viable and nutritionally rich resources for the burgeoning global population. The engineering of the gut microbiota has demonstrated potential in enhancing poultry health by establishing a homeostatic milieu and refining immune responses, optimizing metabolic pathways, and augmenting the physiological responses and structural integrity of the involved organs. The processes of fermentation, nutrient uptake, and absorption, alongside their optimized utilization by the host, are governed by complex interactions within the functional population of the gut microbiota. Microbiota influences these responses through the synthesis of distinct microbial metabolites, especially in the form of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) which affect host gene expression through both genetic and epigenetic mechanisms. The widespread use of antibiotic growth promoters disrupts the composition and function of the gut microbiota, resulting in adverse effects on host health and long-term sustainability. These concerns underscore the urgent need to develop alternative, safer, and more organic methodologies for sustainable poultry production. In addition, we examine the bidirectional influence of the host on the modulation of the gut microbiota in hope of future personalized treatments. The engineering of gut microbiota by various means is a viable alternative to antibiotic growth promoters, having been shown to significantly enhance both the quality and quantity of eggs and meat within the poultry industry.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticGastrointestinal MicrobiomePoultryAnimalsBacteriaFatty Acids, VolatileGenetic EngineeringMeatFatty Acids, VolatileAntibiotic growth promotersEngineeringEpigeneticsGut microbiomeSCFAs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.