Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41329372›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025

Predictors of immobility following surgery for periprosthetic hip fractures.

Christopher Lampert, Florian Pachmann, Kathrin Pfahl, Boris Michael Holzapfel, Wolfgang Böcker, Tobias Helfen, Carl Neuerburg, Leon Faust

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christopher LampertDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany. Christopher.Lampert@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Florian PachmannDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Kathrin PfahlDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Boris Michael HolzapfelDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Wolfgang BöckerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Tobias HelfenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Carl NeuerburgDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Leon FaustDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeriprosthetic femoral fractures (PPF) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) are a growing clinical challenge, particularly in the elderly. Postoperative mobility is a key determinant of outcome, yet little is known about how surgical treatment and weight-bearing protocols influence functional recovery in this population.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 186 patients aged ≥ 65 years treated surgically for Vancouver type B or C PPF between January 2017 and August 2023 at a level 1 trauma center. Patients underwent either open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or revision arthroplasty. Postoperative weight-bearing protocols were categorized as full weight bearing (FWB) or partial weight bearing (PWB). The primary outcome was mobility status at hospital discharge. Binary logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for immobility.

resultsOf the 186 patients included (mean age 82.4 ± 7.4 years), 64.5% were mobilized with FWB. In the ORIF group, patients allowed FWB were significantly older (85.5 ± 7.4 vs. 80.2 ± 6.3 years, p < 0.001). No significant differences in mobility, complication rates, revision surgery, or in-hospital mortality were observed between weight-bearing regimens, regardless of the type of surgery. Logistic regression identified intraoperative blood transfusion (OR = 3.17) and higher ASA scores (ASA III: OR = 9.10; ASA IV: OR = 32.03) as independent predictors of postoperative immobility. Neither the postoperative weight-bearing protocol nor the surgical procedure had a significant impact on mobility outcomes.

conclusionThis study examines postoperative weight-bearing strategies on clinical outcomes in patients with periprosthetic hip fractures and simultaneously identifies independent risk factors associated with postoperative immobility. Our findings suggest that mobility outcomes are more influenced by patient-related factors than by surgical procedure. Our findings support the safe implementation of full weight-bearing protocols in elderly patients following periprosthetic femoral fractures, regardless of the type of surgical intervention.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipFracture Fixation, InternalHip FracturesMobility LimitationPeriprosthetic FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleOpen Fracture ReductionProximal Femoral FracturesReoperationRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsWeight-BearingOrthogeriatricPeriprosthetic femoral fracturePostoperative mobilityWeight-bearing protocol

Identifiers

PMID41329372
PMCPMC12672810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.