ArticleOecologia2025
Petiole mechanics of coexisting tree species in a warm-temperate forest understory in relation to leaf size, leaf habit, and leaf form.
Article in Oecologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Petiole mechanics is essential for displaying leaf lamina efficiently in a shaded forest understory. We investigated the structure, anatomy, and mechanics of the petioles of 25 coexisting woody species in a warm-temperate forest understory and related them to interspecific differences in leaf size, habit (evergreen vs deciduous leaves), and form (simple vs compound leaves). Flexural stiffness of the petioles was greater in large leaves than in small leaves, in evergreen leaves than in deciduous leaves of similar area, and in compound leaves than in simple leaves of similar area. Greater second-order moment of area of petioles was responsible for greater flexural stiffness for species with large leaves and evergreen species. In contrast, the petioles of compound leaves showed a greater modulus of elasticity, but a smaller second-order moment of area compared to those of simple leaves of similar leaf area. Anatomical properties were related to the flexural stiffness and resulted in different biomass costs of the petioles. These results are consistent with the idea that the petioles of compound leaves are analogous to laterally growing branches, in which the increase in density is theoretically efficient in terms of the mass required to produce a branch of a given length. Therefore, different factors constrained the flexural stiffness of petioles among coexisting species of different leaf groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41329347What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.