ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2025
Interventions for Population Genetic Screening in Ethnic and Racial Minorities: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This scoping review synthesizes evidence on interventions designed to increase awareness, access, and uptake of genetic counseling and genetic testing for hereditary cancer risk among racial and ethnic minority populations in the United States. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Embase (through March 2024) for primary quantitative and qualitative studies published in English (2005-2024) that evaluated U.S.-based interventions to improve awareness, referrals, or utilization of genetic services among racial/ethnic minorities. Study quality was appraised with Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklists. Owing to heterogeneity in designs and outcomes, findings were narratively synthesized. Of 3,280 records identified, 26 studies met inclusion criteria. Interventions encompassed culturally tailored educational programs, community outreach, provider training and workflow integration, digital decision aids/telehealth models, navigation or community health worker programs, and system-level/registry approaches. Most studies reported improvements in knowledge, referral quality or rates, and participation in counseling and/or testing; several documented narrowing of disparities in specific settings when structural supports were embedded. Limitations include heterogeneity across interventions and outcomes, limited long-term follow-up, and variation in study quality and measurement. The evidence suggests that culturally and linguistically tailored education is most effective when paired with navigation and integrated into clinical or public-health workflows, and that hybrid telehealth models can expand reach when coupled with interpersonal support. Aligning culturally resonant strategies with structural reforms offers a credible pathway to more equitable access to cancer genetics services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41329293What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.