ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2025
Mobile-Based Digital Rehabilitation Program for Patients After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common treatment for degenerative cervical spine disease, yet its frequent postoperative follow-up places substantial demands on both patients and health care systems. A digital program integrating computer-vision-guided exercise, wearable posture monitoring, and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) could provide remote monitoring and rehabilitation to alleviate this burden. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and compliance of a 12-week digital rehabilitation program after ACDF compared with conventional in-person therapy. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 336 postoperative patients self-selected either a 12-week mobile-based program incorporating computer-vision-guided exercises, wearable posture sensors, and cognitive behavioral therapy (n=270), or in-person rehabilitation group (IRG, n=66) involving weekly therapist-supervised sessions and paper-based home exercises. Digital users were stratified into a digital rehabilitation completion group (DCG, n=192) and a digital rehabilitation noncompletion group (DNG, n=78). All participants were recruited at a single tertiary hospital and returned to the clinic for outcome assessments at 0, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. Outcomes-primarily pain (visual analog scale [VAS]) and disability (neck disability index [NDI]), as well as 36-item short form survey mental component summary (SF-36 MCS), 3-plane cervical range of motion (ROM), muscle endurance, and patient satisfaction-were recorded at 0, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 29.0; IBM Corporation). Results were reported as means, SDs, and 95% CIs. Results: Both the DCG (n=192, who completed all digital sessions) and IRG (who completed 12 weeks of weekly in-person sessions and home exercises) demonstrated significant improvements in pain and disability at weeks 12 and 24, with no significant differences between groups (P>.05). At Week 12, VAS decreased by -2.5 (95% CI -3.0 to -2.0) in the DCG and -2.8 (-3.7 to -1.9) in the IRG; NDI decreased by -6.8 (-10.3 to -3.3) and -8.1 (-14.3 to -1.9), respectively. At Week 24, VAS and NDI reductions reached -4.0 (-4.5 to -3.5) and -13.3 (-17.4 to -9.2) in the DCG, and -4.1 (-5.0 to -3.2) and -14.2 (-21.3 to -7.1) in the IRG. In contrast, the DNG showed minimal improvements: VAS changes were -0.8 (-1.6 to 0.0) at week 12 and -1.3 (-2.1 to -0.5) at week 24; NDI changes were -2.2 (-8.2 to 3.8) and -6.4 (-13.0 to 0.2), respectively (P<.05 compared to DCG and IRG). Conclusions: The digital rehab program led to comparable improvements in pain, function, and mental health as conventional in-person rehab. Higher adherence was linked to better outcomes, supporting digital rehab as an effective, patient-centered approach after ACDF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.