Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41329127›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2025

Mobile-Based Digital Rehabilitation Program for Patients After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Prospective Cohort Study.

Sen Liu, Xin Chen, Di Liu, Crystal Ye Lin, Yaping Chen, Siyi Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sen LiuDepartment of Orthopeadics, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (PUMCH-CAMS), No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China, 86 13810003291.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1423-2948
Xin ChenSpinal Surgery Department, Jishuitan Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0182-754X
Di LiuMedical Innovation Department, Jiakang Zhongzhi Technology Company, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7372-0098
Crystal Ye LinPritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8195-9042
Yaping ChenDepartment of Orthopeadics, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (PUMCH-CAMS), No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China, 86 13810003291.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2332-3892
Siyi CaiDepartment of Orthopeadics, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (PUMCH-CAMS), No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China, 86 13810003291.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0274-1825

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common treatment for degenerative cervical spine disease, yet its frequent postoperative follow-up places substantial demands on both patients and health care systems. A digital program integrating computer-vision-guided exercise, wearable posture monitoring, and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) could provide remote monitoring and rehabilitation to alleviate this burden. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and compliance of a 12-week digital rehabilitation program after ACDF compared with conventional in-person therapy. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 336 postoperative patients self-selected either a 12-week mobile-based program incorporating computer-vision-guided exercises, wearable posture sensors, and cognitive behavioral therapy (n=270), or in-person rehabilitation group (IRG, n=66) involving weekly therapist-supervised sessions and paper-based home exercises. Digital users were stratified into a digital rehabilitation completion group (DCG, n=192) and a digital rehabilitation noncompletion group (DNG, n=78). All participants were recruited at a single tertiary hospital and returned to the clinic for outcome assessments at 0, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. Outcomes-primarily pain (visual analog scale [VAS]) and disability (neck disability index [NDI]), as well as 36-item short form survey mental component summary (SF-36 MCS), 3-plane cervical range of motion (ROM), muscle endurance, and patient satisfaction-were recorded at 0, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 29.0; IBM Corporation). Results were reported as means, SDs, and 95% CIs. Results: Both the DCG (n=192, who completed all digital sessions) and IRG (who completed 12 weeks of weekly in-person sessions and home exercises) demonstrated significant improvements in pain and disability at weeks 12 and 24, with no significant differences between groups (P>.05). At Week 12, VAS decreased by -2.5 (95% CI -3.0 to -2.0) in the DCG and -2.8 (-3.7 to -1.9) in the IRG; NDI decreased by -6.8 (-10.3 to -3.3) and -8.1 (-14.3 to -1.9), respectively. At Week 24, VAS and NDI reductions reached -4.0 (-4.5 to -3.5) and -13.3 (-17.4 to -9.2) in the DCG, and -4.1 (-5.0 to -3.2) and -14.2 (-21.3 to -7.1) in the IRG. In contrast, the DNG showed minimal improvements: VAS changes were -0.8 (-1.6 to 0.0) at week 12 and -1.3 (-2.1 to -0.5) at week 24; NDI changes were -2.2 (-8.2 to 3.8) and -6.4 (-13.0 to 0.2), respectively (P<.05 compared to DCG and IRG). Conclusions: The digital rehab program led to comparable improvements in pain, function, and mental health as conventional in-person rehab. Higher adherence was linked to better outcomes, supporting digital rehab as an effective, patient-centered approach after ACDF.

Indexed as

anterior cervical discectomy and fusioncomputer visiondigital rehabilitationpostoperative rehabilitationremote rehabilitationwearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID41329127
PMCPMC12671286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.