Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41328999›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2025

Taylor L Hancock, Elizabeth K Dahedl, Hidetoshi Urakawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Taylor L HancockDepartment of Biology, Doane University, Crete, Nebraska, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3117-9413
Elizabeth K DahedlDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Studies, The Water School, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, Florida, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-3421-8424
Hidetoshi UrakawaDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Studies, The Water School, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3748-6027

Funding

National Science Foundation DEB-1664052State of Florida | Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) INV007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Harmful algal blooms (HABs) pose a critical threat to aquatic ecosystems, human health, and economies globally, necessitating effective mitigation strategies. This study investigated the efficacy of two hydrogen peroxide treatments, liquid hydrogen peroxide and sodium percarbonate algaecide Lake Guard Oxy (LGOxy), in the field during a

Indexed as

CarbonatesHarmful Algal BloomHydrogen PeroxideLakesMicrocystisFloridaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SCarbonatesHydrogen PeroxideRNA, Ribosomal, 16ScyanobacteriaHABmetatranscriptomemitigationnitrogen fixation

Identifiers

PMID41328999
PMCPMC12724209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.