Trial reportInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Perceptual Learning Based on Adaptive Contrast Detection Training for Intermittent Exotropia: A Pilot Double-Masked Randomized Controlled Study.
Trial report in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Training in Gabor Orientation Identification Optimizes the Temporal Window of Adults With Anisometropic Amblyopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Molecular and Biomechanical Changes in the Anterior Segment of High Myopic Eyes.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Effects of Home-Based Antisuppression and Binocular Integration Training in Patients with Intermittent Exotropia: A Retrospective Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This pilot randomized clinical study investigated the effects of individualized adaptive perceptual learning on control scores, stereopsis, and ocular alignment in children with intermittent exotropia (IXT). Methods: A total of 56 children with basic-type IXT (5-14 years old) were randomly assigned to either an experiment or placebo group, with 50 subjects included in the final analysis after excluding six participants due to poor adherence or incomplete follow-up. The experimental group underwent 30 days of individualized adaptive contrast detection training at their respective cutoff spatial frequencies, and the placebo group trained at a fixed low spatial frequency (3 cycles/degree). Primary outcome measures were control scores (near and distance). Secondary outcomes included stereoacuity (near and distance), ocular deviation magnitude (near and distance), and interocular suppression. Assessments were carried out before (e.g., baseline) and after (e.g., day 31) training and at follow-up visits (e.g., day 44 or 14 days after treatment cessation). Results: After training, both groups showed significant improvements in distance scores (experimental group, P < 0.001; placebo group, P = 0.001) and near control scores (experimental group, P = 0.005; placebo group, P = 0.003), albeit without significant difference between them (distance, P = 0.231; near, P = 0.738). The experimental group demonstrated greater enhancements in stereopsis (distance, P = 0.003; near, P = 0.006) and ocular deviation magnitude (distance: P = 0.043), as opposed to the placebo group. Improvements in control scores (near and distance), stereoacuity (near and distance), ocular deviation magnitude (near and distance), and interocular suppression were maintained in the experimental group at follow-up visits, whereas the placebo group regressed to baseline. Conclusions: Individualized adaptive perceptual learning at each individual's cutoff spatial frequency improved control abilities, stereopsis, and ocular alignment in children with IXT, with effects maintained (at least) 14 days after treatment cessation. The clinical significance of these findings requires further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.