Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41328908›Full record

ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2025

L1CAM/CD171 expression in human tumors and its association with tumor phenotype.

Seyma Büyücek, Magalie Lurati, Katharina Möller, Florian Fiehweger, Ria Schlichter, Anne Menz, Andreas M Luebke, Viktor Reiswich, Martina Kluth, Claudia Hube-Magg and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Seyma BüyücekInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Magalie LuratiInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Katharina MöllerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Florian FiehwegerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Ria SchlichterInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Anne MenzInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Andreas M LuebkeInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Viktor ReiswichInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Martina KluthInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Claudia Hube-MaggInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Andrea HinschInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Florian LutzInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sören WeidemannInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Frank JacobsenInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
David DumInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Christian BernreutherInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Patrick LebokInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Clinical Center Osnabrueck, Osnabrueck, Germany.
Guido SauterInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Andreas H MarxDepartment of Pathology, Academic Hospital Fuerth, Fuerth, Germany.
Ronald SimonInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. r.simon@uke.de.
Christoph FrauneInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Clinical Center Osnabrueck, Osnabrueck, Germany.
Natalia GorbokonInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Eike BurandtInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sarah MinnerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan SteurerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Till S ClauditzInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Till KrechInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Institute of Pathology, Clinical Center Osnabrueck, Osnabrueck, Germany.
Viktoria ChiricoInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Maximilian LennartzInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeL1CAM (CD171) is suggested to play a critical role in cancer. Because of its expression in only few normal tissues and its membranous nature, L1CAM is a promising drug target. Patient/material and methods: To clarify the role of L1CAM expression in different cancer types, a tissue microarray containing 20,079 samples from 135 different tumor entities and 608 samples of 76 different normal tissue types was analyzed by immunohistochemistry.

resultsMembranous L1CAM staining was found in 1,175 (9.1%) of 12,888 interpretable tumor samples, including 301 (2.3%) with weak, 569 (4.4%) with moderate, and 305 (2.4%) with strong positivity. 74 of 135 tumor entities showed L1CAM staining, and 36 tumor categories included at least one case with strong L1CAM staining. The frequency of L1CAM positivity was high in subtypes of neural and neuroendocrine neoplasms (up to 100%), endometrium carcinoma (24.1-31.3%), ovarian cancer (10.0-33.1%), cervical adenocarcinoma (9.1%), malignant melanoma (24.1-31.3%), malignant mesothelioma (16.7-20.8%), adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal and biliopancreatic tract (4.9-14.1%), and in urothelial tumors (up to 10.3%). High L1CAM expression was associated with invasive tumor growth (pTa vs. pT2-4) in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (p<0.0001) and with mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal adenocarcinoma (p=0.0064). However, L1CAM staining was unrelated to tumor phenotype in seven other tumor entities.

interpretationThe results highlighted a small number of tumor entities that could be targeted by anti-L1CAM drugs, once these are proved to be sufficiently safe and efficient. L1CAM expression does not appear to confer an aggressive phenotype to affected cancer cells.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorNeoplasmsNeural Cell Adhesion Molecule L1FemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMalePhenotypeTissue Array AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorL1CAM protein, humanNeural Cell Adhesion Molecule L1

Identifiers

PMID41328908
PMCPMC12681027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.