ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Recombinant Human Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (rhFSH) in Infertile Women undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART): A Korean Nationwide Cohort Study.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite widespread rhFSH use in infertile women undergoing ART, real-world comparative data on its effectiveness and safety across different rhFSH types remain limited. Using the HIRA claims database, we included 10,684 women aged 20-39 with infertility (2016-2021) who used only rhFSH in their first in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Outcome variables comprised effectiveness (≥ 11 oocytes retrieved, pregnancy rates and live birth rate) and safety (ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, preterm birth and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome [OHSS]) in the whole cohort, further categorized into follitropin and other rhFSH. Baseline characteristics were described, and relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using a generalized linear model, adjusting for age and imbalanced variables. Of 10,684 patients prescribed rhFSH, 7.1% were aged 20-29, 41.6% were 30-34, and 51.3% were 35-39. ICSI was utilized in 57.7% of cycles, and 76.8% used the GnRH antagonist protocol. The live birth rate was 38.8%, and the OHSS rate was 5.9%. Comparing baseline characteristics of the follitropin (n = 2,594) and other rhFSH group (n = 8,090), ICSI (62.2% vs. 56.3%) and GnRH antagonist protocol (81.3% vs. 75.3%) were more common in the follitropin group. Women who received follitropin were more likely to have ≥ 11 oocytes retrieved (adjusted RR, 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02-1.16) and less likely to have OHSS (adjusted RR, 0.73; 95% CI: 0.60-0.90). These findings provide real-world evidence supporting rhFSH effectiveness and safety in fresh IVF cycles, with follitropin potentially offering advantages in oocyte retrieval and reduced OHSS rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.