ArticleClinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology2026
Documentation of Drug and Non-Drug Allergies in Public Hospital Electronic Health Records: A National Survey.
Article in Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInconsistent documentation of known allergies in electronic patient records (EPRs) poses a major patient safety risk. Unlike drug allergies, food and non-drug allergens lack standardised documentation frameworks. This study evaluated how such allergies are recorded across NHS Trusts and the extent of avoidable harm from exposures.
methodsWe conducted a national cross-sectional, study. Freedom of Information (FOI) requests were sent to all 209 public (NHS) hospital Trusts (December 2024) to collect data on allergy-related incidents, EPR availability, training and governance. An online survey was distributed to British Society for Allergy & Clinical Immunology (BSACI) members (February 2025) to capture clinician experiences, challenges and suggestions. Quantitative data were analysed using non-parametric statistics; qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis.
resultsResponses were received from 194 Trusts (93%), with 145 providing complete datasets (582 hospitals). Sixty-one different EPR platforms were identified, with 44 Trusts operating multiple systems. Across a median 10-year span, 12,385 allergy-related incidents were reported: 7724 (62%) drugs and 1277 (10%) food/non-drug allergens. Over half of Trusts (54%) lacked a dedicated incident-reporting category for food/non-drug allergens, suggesting underestimation. Trusts without EPRs reported 140% more incidents than those with EPRs (p = 0.002). Those with in-house allergy services, training and guidance recorded higher incident rates, consistent with enhanced recognition and reporting. The BSACI survey revealed challenges including poor EPR usability, limited coding options, weak alert systems and reliance on free text. Ninety percent of respondents supported national guidance on allergy documentation.
conclusionMarked heterogeneity exists in NHS EPR systems and food/non-drug allergy documentation practices. Trusts without EPRs experience higher reporting rates, while training and specialist services are associated with improved recognition. The absence of dedicated categories for food and non-drug allergies contributes to systematic underreporting. These findings demonstrate how fragmented systems and inconsistent governance directly compromise allergy safety across UK hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.