Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41328783›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology2026

Documentation of Drug and Non-Drug Allergies in Public Hospital Electronic Health Records: A National Survey.

Melvin Lee Qiyu, Erika Harnik, Claudia Gore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Melvin Lee QiyuSection of Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2476-960X
Erika HarnikDepartment of Paediatric Allergy, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St. Mary's Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8947-8235
Claudia GoreSection of Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3626-5129

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInconsistent documentation of known allergies in electronic patient records (EPRs) poses a major patient safety risk. Unlike drug allergies, food and non-drug allergens lack standardised documentation frameworks. This study evaluated how such allergies are recorded across NHS Trusts and the extent of avoidable harm from exposures.

methodsWe conducted a national cross-sectional, study. Freedom of Information (FOI) requests were sent to all 209 public (NHS) hospital Trusts (December 2024) to collect data on allergy-related incidents, EPR availability, training and governance. An online survey was distributed to British Society for Allergy & Clinical Immunology (BSACI) members (February 2025) to capture clinician experiences, challenges and suggestions. Quantitative data were analysed using non-parametric statistics; qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsResponses were received from 194 Trusts (93%), with 145 providing complete datasets (582 hospitals). Sixty-one different EPR platforms were identified, with 44 Trusts operating multiple systems. Across a median 10-year span, 12,385 allergy-related incidents were reported: 7724 (62%) drugs and 1277 (10%) food/non-drug allergens. Over half of Trusts (54%) lacked a dedicated incident-reporting category for food/non-drug allergens, suggesting underestimation. Trusts without EPRs reported 140% more incidents than those with EPRs (p = 0.002). Those with in-house allergy services, training and guidance recorded higher incident rates, consistent with enhanced recognition and reporting. The BSACI survey revealed challenges including poor EPR usability, limited coding options, weak alert systems and reliance on free text. Ninety percent of respondents supported national guidance on allergy documentation.

conclusionMarked heterogeneity exists in NHS EPR systems and food/non-drug allergy documentation practices. Trusts without EPRs experience higher reporting rates, while training and specialist services are associated with improved recognition. The absence of dedicated categories for food and non-drug allergies contributes to systematic underreporting. These findings demonstrate how fragmented systems and inconsistent governance directly compromise allergy safety across UK hospitals.

Indexed as

DocumentationDrug HypersensitivityElectronic Health RecordsFood HypersensitivityHospitals, PublicHypersensitivityCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID41328783
PMCPMC12774576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.