ArticleHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia
Monitoring of Nonacog Beta Pegol: One-Stage Clotting Assay With Kaolin Reagent as a Practical Alternative to Chromogenic Methods.
Article in Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Monitoring of Nonacog Beta Pegol: One-Stage Clotting Assay With Kaolin Reagent as a Practical Alternative to Chromogenic Methods.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of HemophiliaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAccurate monitoring of nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP) is essential to ensure appropriate treatment and to avoid under- or overdosing, which may result in clinical complications. The product's extended half-life, achieved through molecular modification, poses challenges for activity measurement, particularly when using a one-stage clotting assay (OSA). Therefore, a chromogenic substrate assay (CSA) is preferred, although it may be less practical for urgent or routine monitoring.
aimTo evaluate OSA and CSA for N9-GP measurement, focusing on the suitability of the OSA STA CK Prest reagent on the STA R MAX analyser.
methodsFactor IX activity (FIX:C) of N9-GP in vitro spiked and post-infusion samples were measured using various OSA reagents and CSA across different analysers. The in vitro sample results were evaluated as percentage recovery; the OSA STA CK Prest results from both spiked and post-infusion samples were compared with those obtained by the CSA Biophen FIX.
resultsAcceptable recoveries for samples spiked at concentrations of 0.04, 0.08, 0.15, 0.61 and 1.22 IU/mL were achieved using CSA Biophen FIX (mean recovery 92% with the CN 3000 analyser and 108% with the STA R MAX analyser) and OSA STA CK Prest (mean recovery 92%, range 86%-111%). STA CK Prest showed FIX:C results comparable to Biophen FIX in both in vitro and post-infusion samples.
conclusionsSTA CK Prest and Biophen FIX showed acceptable recoveries for N9-GP, with FIX:C results in good agreement in both in vitro and post-infusion samples. This supports the reliability of STA CK Prest for FIX:C measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.