ArticleCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology2025
Predictors of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Pediatric Patients and Patients With Congenital Heart Disease.
Article in Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancements in pacing and ICD technologies: Potential implications for complex congenital heart disease in adults.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an important therapeutic option in selected pediatric patients and patients with congenital heart disease with reduced systemic ventricular ejection fraction (SVEF). However, the identification of optimal responders is challenging. This study aimed to identify predictors of response to CRT in children and patients with congenital heart disease at 5 large quaternary referral centers.
methodsPatients were aged <21 or had congenital heart disease and had SVEF <45%, symptomatic heart failure, and significant electrical dyssynchrony before CRT. Primary outcome was defined as an ordinal response at 6 or 12 months: (1) improved SVEF (≥5%), (2) unchanged SVEF, and (3) worse SVEF. Secondary outcome utilized a propensity score-matched control cohort. Response to CRT was defined using the longitudinal trajectory of SVEF up to the latest follow-up.
resultsIn total, 167 eligible CRT recipients were identified across the 5 centers; 150 had comprehensive data at 6 or 12 months: 96 (64%) with improved SVEF, 26 (17%) unchanged, and 28 (19%) worsened. Mean increase in SVEF was 11% (interquartile range, 3%-21%). On univariable ordinal regression, lower SVEF (
conclusionsCRT in children and patients with congenital heart disease frequently results in an improvement in SVEF. Those with lower SVEF, conduction delay to the lateral wall of the systemic ventricle, and those with a systemic left ventricle are most likely to respond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.