Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41328574›Full record

ArticleCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology2025

Safety, Efficacy, and Mid-Term Outcomes of Pulsed Field Ablation for Cavotricuspid Isthmus-Dependent Flutter: Real-World Data From a Major Health System Registry.

Juan F Rodriguez-Riascos, Hema S Vemulapalli, Poojan Prajapati, Padmapriya Muthu, James Y Kim, Dan Sorajja, Win-Kuang Shen, Hicham El Masry, Mayank Sardana, Arturo M Valverde and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Efficacy, safety, and procedural outcomes of pulsed field ablation for cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Juan F Rodriguez-Riascos *Division of Cardiovascular Diseases (J.F.R.-R., H.S.V., P.P., P.M., D.S., W.-K.S., H.E.M., M.S., A.M.V., K.S.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.ORCID 0000-0002-8271-9128
Hema S Vemulapalli *Division of Cardiovascular Diseases (J.F.R.-R., H.S.V., P.P., P.M., D.S., W.-K.S., H.E.M., M.S., A.M.V., K.S.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.ORCID 0009-0001-2942-1031
Poojan PrajapatiDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases (J.F.R.-R., H.S.V., P.P., P.M., D.S., W.-K.S., H.E.M., M.S., A.M.V., K.S.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.ORCID 0009-0005-4959-1344
Padmapriya MuthuDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases (J.F.R.-R., H.S.V., P.P., P.M., D.S., W.-K.S., H.E.M., M.S., A.M.V., K.S.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.ORCID 0009-0002-5561-0431
James Y KimDepartment of Internal Medicine (J.Y.K.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.ORCID 0000-0001-6073-2009
Dan SorajjaDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases (J.F.R.-R., H.S.V., P.P., P.M., D.S., W.-K.S., H.E.M., M.S., A.M.V., K.S.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.ORCID 0000-0003-1976-6420
Win-Kuang ShenDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases (J.F.R.-R., H.S.V., P.P., P.M., D.S., W.-K.S., H.E.M., M.S., A.M.V., K.S.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.ORCID 0000-0003-1915-9815
Hicham El MasryDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases (J.F.R.-R., H.S.V., P.P., P.M., D.S., W.-K.S., H.E.M., M.S., A.M.V., K.S.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.ORCID 0000-0002-2470-2862
Mayank SardanaDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases (J.F.R.-R., H.S.V., P.P., P.M., D.S., W.-K.S., H.E.M., M.S., A.M.V., K.S.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.
Arturo M ValverdeDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases (J.F.R.-R., H.S.V., P.P., P.M., D.S., W.-K.S., H.E.M., M.S., A.M.V., K.S.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.ORCID 0000-0003-2780-6744
Thomas M MungerDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases (T.M.M.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.
Komandoor SrivathsanDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases (J.F.R.-R., H.S.V., P.P., P.M., D.S., W.-K.S., H.E.M., M.S., A.M.V., K.S.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.ORCID 0000-0001-9732-0243

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation is frequently performed either as a standalone procedure or in combination with pulmonary vein isolation. With the rapid adoption of pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation, it is essential to delineate the utility of this modality in treating CTI-dependent atrial flutter (AFL). This study aims to evaluate the procedural and clinical outcomes of CTI ablation using pulsed field energy.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent pulsed field ablation for CTI-dependent AFL between January 2024 and March 2025. The primary end points were acute procedural success, periprocedural complications, and CTI-dependent AFL recurrence during follow-up.

resultsA total of 132 patients underwent CTI nonthermal ablation. The median age was 69.5 years, and 27.3% were female. The Farawave catheter was used in 93.9% of cases, PulseSelect in 4.5%, and Sphere-9 in 1.5%. Acute block was achieved in 99.2% of patients, although 8 required adjunctive radiofrequency ablation to complete the line. Periprocedural complications included transient ST-segment elevation in 2 patients and transient conduction disturbances in 3. During a median follow-up of 114 days (n=131), 5 patients (3.8%) experienced recurrence of typical AFL. The 6-month typical AFL-free survival estimate was 93.6%.

conclusionsPulsed field ablation appears to be a feasible and effective strategy for CTI-dependent AFL. However, anatomic variability may limit its universal applicability with current catheter designs. Although acute procedural success is high, the long-term durability of the CTI block and its comparative efficacy versus conventional thermal ablation remain areas requiring further investigation.

Indexed as

Atrial FlutterCatheter AblationTricuspid ValveAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRegistriesRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment Outcomeatrial fibrillationatrial fluttercathetersechocardiography

Identifiers

PMID41328574
PMCPMC12711271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.