ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026
Development and Preliminary Application of a KAP Scale for Nursing Assistants in Pain Care for Older Adults With Dementia.
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of surgical assistance by Japanese nurse practitioners in robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass graft surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study aimed to develop and preliminarily validate the KAP scale for pain management in older adults with dementia among nursing assistants.
designA cross-sectional study.
methodsAn initial item pool was constructed through literature reviews, semi-structured interviews and team discussions. Items were screened and optimised through two rounds of Delphi expert consultations, a pilot survey and item analysis, yielding a draft version of the scale. Psychometric evaluation was conducted to refine the scale into its final form.
resultsThe final KAP scale developed in this study comprised 31 items. The scale exhibited good content validity, with item-level content validity index (I-CVI) values ranging from 0.83 to 1.00. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that the scale extracted five factors, which accounted for 65.732% of the cumulative variance, and all items demonstrated rotated factor loadings > 0.5, indicating good construct validity. The Cronbach's α coefficients for the knowledge, attitudes and practices dimensions were 0.877, 0.915 and 0.935, respectively, and the split-half reliability coefficients were 0.909, 0.886 and 0.864.
conclusionThe KAP scale for pain care in older adults with dementia developed in this study possesses good reliability and validity and can be used to assess the knowledge, attitudes and behavioural levels of nursing assistants in pain care. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: This study developed and psychometrically validated a KAP scale specifically designed to assess pain care for older adults with dementia among nursing assistants. Clinical managers can utilise this tool to systematically identify deficiencies in staff members' knowledge, attitudes or practices, thereby providing scientific evidence for the development of targeted pain care training programs and pain management strategies. This contributes to enhancing nursing assistants' pain care competence, ultimately alleviating the pain burden of older adults with dementia and improving their quality of life. REPORTING
methodThe STROBE checklist was used as a guideline. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.