Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41328515›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2025

'She mustn't be the mother alone': motivators, barriers, and recommendations for men's engagement with reproductive research in South Africa.

Caitlin V Gardiner, Tshepang Headman, Larske M Soepnel, Jackson Mabasa, Sonja Klingberg, Molebogeng Motlhatlhedi, Michelle Pentecost, Catherine E Draper, Lukhanyo H Nyati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Caitlin V GardinerDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, 40 Aldwych, London, WC2B 4BG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7867-4051
Tshepang HeadmanSAMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag X3 Wits, 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Larske M SoepnelSAMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag X3 Wits, 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Jackson MabasaSAMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag X3 Wits, 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Sonja KlingbergSAMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag X3 Wits, 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Molebogeng MotlhatlhediSAMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag X3 Wits, 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Michelle PentecostDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, 40 Aldwych, London, WC2B 4BG, United Kingdom.
Catherine E DraperSAMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag X3 Wits, 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Lukhanyo H NyatiSAMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag X3 Wits, 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Funding

CIHRKing's College LondonSouth African Medical Research CouncilUK Research and Innovation MR/T040874/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a notable lack of engagement in reproductive and lifecourse research with and from men, with a disproportionate focus on women. While studies investigating the lack of men's engagement with services exist, there is little evidence on their engagement with reproductive and lifecourse research. This article qualitatively examines men's engagement in such research in the Bukhali trial in South Africa. Single, in-depth interviews were conducted with 19 male partners of Bukhali participants, and data were thematically analysed. Results were grouped into three domains: (i) motivators for engagement, (ii) barriers to engagement, and (iii) recommendations to improve engagement. Motivators to engage included partner support, desiring to learn and gain knowledge, and taking the opportunity to access the same perceived trial benefits as their partner. Barriers included having misconceptions around the research, fear and mistrust of hospitals and illness, gendered ideas around 'women's health issues', hesitance around sharing personal details, and lack of time and perceived (financial) benefits. To increase engagement, male partners recommended increasing awareness and creating safe research spaces for men. Each theme was inflected with male partners' sociocultural and contextual realities and provided valuable insights into obstacles and opportunities for improving men's engagement in reproductive research.

Indexed as

MotivationSexual PartnersAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSouth Africagender inequitymen in researchpromoting gender justicereproductive and lifecourse researchresearch engagement

Identifiers

PMID41328515
PMCPMC12669997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.