Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41328504›Full record

ArticleJMIR perioperative medicine2025

Facilitated Peer Discussion for Promoting Better Resident Wellness in Anesthesia Trainees: Qualitative Program Evaluation.

Miku Wake, Nicholas West, Jessica Luo, Nancy Wang, James D Taylor, Kyra Moura, Theresa Newlove, Zoë Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR perioperative medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Miku WakeFaculty of Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0003-4777-6295
Nicholas WestDepartment of Anesthesia, BC Children's Hospital, T3-246, 4480 Oak St, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3V4, Canada, 1 604-875-2711.ORCID 0000-0001-8382-5136
Jessica LuoFaculty of Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0004-2953-5305
Nancy WangDepartment of Anesthesia, BC Children's Hospital, T3-246, 4480 Oak St, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3V4, Canada, 1 604-875-2711.ORCID 0000-0002-5942-5914
James D TaylorDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1099-3646
Kyra MouraDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5256-5837
Theresa NewloveResearch Institute, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9245-3909
Zoë BrownDepartment of Anesthesia, BC Children's Hospital, T3-246, 4480 Oak St, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3V4, Canada, 1 604-875-2711.ORCID 0000-0001-9408-8362

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anesthesia residents experience nonroutine clinical events during perioperative patient care, including workplace stressors or adverse incidents that may cause physical and emotional stress. These events can lead to burnout and negative mental health outcomes. Burnout and depression rates are lower when residents have adequate support systems within their workplace. Better resident wellness (BREW) Rounds are a weekly 1-hour peer discussion for anesthesia residents, facilitated by a registered psychologist at our institution. Although shown to improve residents' well-being, a deeper understanding of the benefits of such programs may support their expansion to other residency programs. Objective: This study aimed to explore the benefits and most effective features of BREW Rounds to guide the development of similar programs at other institutions. Methods: Following research ethics board approval, we conducted a qualitative descriptive study based on semistructured interviews with anesthesia residents who had participated in one or more BREW sessions and with the main BREW Rounds facilitator. Topics of discussion included community building, belonging, mentorship, facilitation, discussion of nonclinical aspects, and removal of hierarchy. Interviews were conducted on videoconferencing software by researchers who were not involved in supervising or assessing the trainees. Audio recordings were auto-transcribed, deidentified, verified, and interpreted using thematic content analysis. Further perspectives on BREW Rounds were obtained from staff anesthesiologists through an anonymous online survey. Results: We interviewed 10 residents (6 junior, 3 senior, and 1 transition-to-practice) and 1 facilitator. Emerging themes included (1) access to a safe space free of judgment, allowing participants to be vulnerable about clinical or nonclinical aspects of their training, (2) building a sense of community in a fast-paced and often isolating environment, (3) providing opportunities for mentorship between junior and senior residents in a frequently changing colleague network, (4) the characteristics that create a "BREW culture", such as behavior norms during sessions and staff respect for protected time, (5) the importance of a good facilitator from outside the anesthesia department, especially during smaller sessions, (6) expanding BREW Rounds to other institutions, and (7) areas for improvement for the current program. Sixteen anesthesiology staff survey responses were available for analysis: 12/16 (75%) anesthesiologists supported residents leaving their clinical duties early for BREW Rounds and 12/16 (75%) believed BREW Rounds benefitted residents' well-being. Conclusions: This qualitative study confirms previous findings that BREW Rounds are beneficial to anesthesia training, improve the psychological wellness of residents, and may positively contribute to patient care. Program directors should recognize their potential positive impact on the learning environment, ensure that all staff and trainees understand the need to create protected time for this activity, consider partnering with wellness initiatives at the institutions in which residents are training, and endeavor to identify experienced and unbiased facilitators to moderate sessions.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologyBurnout, ProfessionalInternship and ResidencyPeer GroupAdultFemaleHumansMaleProgram EvaluationQualitative Researchanesthesiaburnoutfacilitated peer discussionresident wellnesssemistructured interviewsurvey

Identifiers

PMID41328504
PMCPMC12670191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.