Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41328443›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2025

Efficacy and safety of a novel treatment scheme of RC48-ADC plus PD-1 inhibitors in metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter real-world study.

Jun Lin, Junjie Bai, Xiaoyan Li, Yaoan Wen, Yuzhong Ye, Shaoyuan Chen, Huijun Chen, Qianyi Qiu, Jianjia Huang, Yushi Ye and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Redefining breast cancer: therapeutic opportunities in HER2-low and emerging molecular subtypes.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jun LinDepartment of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1666-7530
Junjie BaiDepartment of Urology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7970-6257
Xiaoyan LiDepartment of Pathology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Yaoan WenDepartment of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Yuzhong YeDepartment of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Shaoyuan ChenDepartment of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Huijun ChenDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Qianyi QiuDepartment of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Jianjia HuangDepartment of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Yushi YeDepartment of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Rong LiuDepartment of Urology, Pingtan Campus of Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Pingtan Comprehensive Experimental Zone Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Deyong KangDepartment of Pathology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Ru ChenDepartment of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Qing LuDepartment of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Yiming SuDepartment of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Weiping ZhangDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Yongbao WeiDepartment of Urology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Shaoxing ZhuDepartment of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Jianhui ChenDepartment of Urology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7494-1258

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) remains a challenging malignancy with limited treatment options. The combination of RC48 (Disitamab Vedotin) plus programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor represents a promising therapeutic strategy. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of RC48 plus PD-1 inhibitors as first-line therapy for mUC in real-world practice. Design: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from mUC patients who received RC48 plus PD-1 inhibitors as first-line therapy between July 2021 and February 2024 from three medical centers. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were calculated to evaluate the clinical efficacy. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were analyzed to assess the safety profiles. Results: A total of 63 patients with mUC were included, with a mean age of 67 years, and 71.4% were male. The most frequent metastatic sites were lymph nodes (77.8%), followed by the lung (31.7%), bone (23.8%), liver (19.0%), and others. The treatment response rates were as follows: 12 patients (19.0%) achieved a complete response, 33 patients (52.4%) had a partial response, and 10 patients (15.9%) experienced stable disease. The ORR was 71.4%, and the DCR was 87.3%. The median PFS was 10.5 months (95% confidence interval: 8.8-14.6 months), and the median OS was not reached. The most common TRAEs included fatigue (36.5%), anemia (34.9%), pruritus (33.3%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (28.6%), and nausea (28.6%). Grade III TRAEs occurred in seven patients (11.1%), and no Grade IV or V TRAEs were observed. Conclusion: The combination of RC48 and PD-1 inhibitors administered in 3-week cycles demonstrates efficacy and manageable safety as first-line therapy for mUC patients in a real-world setting.

Indexed as

first linemetastatic urothelial carcinomaPD-1 inhibitorsRC48-ADCreal-world study

Identifiers

PMID41328443
PMCPMC12665017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.