Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41328287›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025

Clinical target volumes for glioma - Automated delineation to improve neuroanatomic consistency.

Gregory Buti, Marcela Giovenco, Tugba Yilmaz, Ali Ajdari, Christopher P Bridge, Gregory C Sharp, Fredrik Löfman, Helen A Shih, Thomas Bortfeld

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gregory ButiMassachusetts General Hospital/Mass General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiat. Oncol., 100 Blossom St, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Marcela GiovencoRaySearch Laboratories AB, Eugeniavägen 18C, SE-104 30 Stockholm, Sweden.
Tugba YilmazMassachusetts General Hospital/Mass General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiat. Oncol., 100 Blossom St, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Ali AjdariMassachusetts General Hospital/Mass General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiat. Oncol., 100 Blossom St, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Christopher P BridgeMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, 149 Thirteenth St, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Gregory C SharpMassachusetts General Hospital/Mass General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiat. Oncol., 100 Blossom St, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Fredrik LöfmanRaySearch Laboratories AB, Eugeniavägen 18C, SE-104 30 Stockholm, Sweden.
Helen A ShihMassachusetts General Hospital/Mass General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiat. Oncol., 100 Blossom St, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Thomas BortfeldMassachusetts General Hospital/Mass General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiat. Oncol., 100 Blossom St, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Delineating clinical target volumes (CTVs) for glioma is challenging as consistency with the neuroanatomy needs to be carefully verified. We developed an automated approach that incorporates tumor infiltration pathways and anatomic barriers to improve the neuroanatomical consistency and efficiency of CTV delineation. Materials and methods: A deep learning model for brain structure segmentation was developed based on manual delineations of hemispheres, brainstem, cerebellum, optic chiasm, optic nerves, ventricles, and midline on CT images of ninety-nine glioma patients. Brain structures predictions are integrated into a constrained distance transform that defines the CTV as a 15-mm expansion of the gross tumor volume. Connecting structures with white matter tracts allow for expansions across different structure boundaries, e.g., cerebellum and brainstem connecting at the cerebellar peduncles. Results: Mean (±std) Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) for the hemispheres, brainstem, cerebel-lum, chiasm, optic nerves, midline and ventricles were (98.5 ± 0.8)%, (92.5 ± 2.8)%, (96.7 ± 2.2)% (63.9 ± 12.2)%, (83.8 ± 9.0)%, (81.2 ± 7.0) and (91.5 ± 3.9)%. Mean (±std) 95 % Hausdorff distance (HD95) were, in mm, 1.9 ± 2.5, 7.0 ± 5.4, 1.8 ± 1.2, 7.2 ± 3.2, 2.3 ± 1.0, 9.5 ± 10.5, and 3.8 ± 3.1, respectively. Auto-generated CTVs are compared against reference CTVs (15-mm expansion constrained by manually-contoured brain structures). The automatic CTVs showed excellent similarity to the reference CTVs with mean (±std) Surface DSC with 2 mm tolerance and HD95 scores of (95.6 ± 3.4)% and (1.4 ± 1.2) mm, respectively. A physician's quality assessment reported that the automated method would result in a substantial amount of time saved in 85 % of CTV delineations. Conclusion: We have successfully incorporated expert knowledge to improve the neuroanatom-ical consistency of automatically-generated CTVs for glioma.

Indexed as

BrainClinical target volumeDeep learningRadiat. Oncol

Identifiers

PMID41328287
PMCPMC12664807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.