ArticleSSM - population health2025
Mapping war trauma: A machine learning approach to predict mental health impacts in Ukraine.
Article in SSM - population health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a predictive modeling system based on the use of GeoAI to estimate mental health outcomes of wartime in Ukrainian cities, utilizing spatially linked data on the environment, infrastructure, and conflict. Six self-reported psychological outcomes, symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, or PSD, anxiety, depression, insomnia, loneliness, and sleep duration, were collected in surveys throughout the war and analyzed in the context of more than 30 spatial predictors: cold exposure, access to heating, power outages, housing insulation, and city-level frequency of drone, missile, artillery, and shelling attacks. Predictor datasets that are derived from incident tracking, World Health Organization, and humanitarian reporting systems, and environmental indicators derived from surveys, which are harmonized using a spatial data integration protocol. In realizing the GeoAI concept, we developed a machine learning pipeline utilizing Ordinary Least Squares, Lasso, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Extreme Gradient Boosting. All models were trained and tested on spatially independent training and testing splits in order to preserve the generalization properties of the models. XG Boost is also shown to be effective, with R2 values often exceeding 0.74 and MAPE values typically less than 7.2 %. Feature importance analysis revealed that key drivers of being exposed to prolonged cold, inadequate insulation, and exposure to drones or artillery were found to be dominant drivers of psychological distress. This GeoAI framework combines the strength of geospatial analytics with artificial intelligence to give precise and high-resolution location-based forecasting of mental health burdens in conflict settings. The method offers a flexible tool for a proactive humanitarian response that can target mental health services spatially based on predictions of mental health vulnerability, in contrast to retrospective clinical information, for relief agencies and public health planners. This work is a step towards incorporating GeoAI in the field of crisis epidemiology, demonstrating the ability to use GeoAI in real-time, place-based mental health planning in war-affected areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.