ArticleJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research2025
Anti-acne potential of
Article in Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study explores the bioactive compounds in Materials and Methods: 3.3 gm of Results: The GC-MS analysis detected several bioactive compounds in the extract, including fatty acids (e.g., n-hexadecanoic acid and linoleic acid esters), polysaccharides, vitamins, aromatic compounds, and diterpenoids. Fatty acids and vitamin compounds dominated, comprising 72.20% of the extract, with alpha-tocopherol and its derivatives as prominent components. Antimicrobial activity was assessed using the disc-diffusion method. The extract demonstrated notable antibacterial effects, particularly at 10 ppm, achieving inhibition zones of 18.0 ± 2.0 mm against Conclusion: The results indicate that microalgae from the Chlorophyceae class are more effective against Gram-positive than Gram-negative bacteria. These findings emphasize the potential of bioactive compounds as anti-acne agents, suggesting they could serve as substitutes for antibiotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.