Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41328211›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2025

Responses to increased rates of caesarean births.

Rana Islamiah Zahroh, Meghan A Bohren, Ana Pilar Betrán

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rana Islamiah ZahrohNossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 32 Lincoln Square North, Carlton, Victoria, 3053, Australia.
Meghan A BohrenNossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 32 Lincoln Square North, Carlton, Victoria, 3053, Australia.
Ana Pilar BetránUNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Performing caesarean sections without medical need exposes women and babies to unnecessary risks without clear benefits. Yet the global number of caesarean sections has continued to rise considerably over the years, with caesarean sections increasingly performed before the onset of labour and among women at low risk of birth complications. In recent years, considerable efforts have been made to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections. However, interventions that aim to reduce such births are complex, have mixed outcomes, do not translate well between settings and lack clear evidence on which components or mechanisms drive success. In this article, we outline a three-step pathway for implementing interventions that aim to optimize caesarean use: (i) conduct formative research to identify context-specific needs and priorities; (ii) design evidence-based, multifaceted interventions; and (iii) ensure implementation through meaningful stakeholder engagement. Finally, we emphasize how improving the quality of care during childbirth is key to achieving optimal and equitable use of caesarean sections.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionUnnecessary ProceduresFemaleGlobal HealthHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41328211
PMCPMC12665281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.