ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2025
Responses to increased rates of caesarean births.
Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Performing caesarean sections without medical need exposes women and babies to unnecessary risks without clear benefits. Yet the global number of caesarean sections has continued to rise considerably over the years, with caesarean sections increasingly performed before the onset of labour and among women at low risk of birth complications. In recent years, considerable efforts have been made to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections. However, interventions that aim to reduce such births are complex, have mixed outcomes, do not translate well between settings and lack clear evidence on which components or mechanisms drive success. In this article, we outline a three-step pathway for implementing interventions that aim to optimize caesarean use: (i) conduct formative research to identify context-specific needs and priorities; (ii) design evidence-based, multifaceted interventions; and (iii) ensure implementation through meaningful stakeholder engagement. Finally, we emphasize how improving the quality of care during childbirth is key to achieving optimal and equitable use of caesarean sections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.