ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2025
Crowdsourced surveillance for neglected tropical diseases, Nigeria.
Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Climate-driven disruptions in local food systems and the transmission pathways of food-borne neglected tropical diseases in Sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Environmental, socioeconomic, and health-system factors associated with NTD hotspots in southern Nigeria: a mixed-methods study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Crowdsourced surveillance for neglected tropical diseases, Nigeria.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To validate a crowdsourced, image-based morbidity hotspot method for surveillance of neglected tropical diseases. Methods: We conducted our crowdsourced surveillance pilot implementation study between November 2022 and October 2024 in 45 communities across three Nigerian states, covering a population of 477 138 people. Three additional states, where the project was not implemented but surveillance data obtained, served as control. Residents self-reported suspected symptoms by using smartphones to capture and transmit images of skin and eye manifestations via digital communication platforms. An expert panel then examined the images to confirm signs of neglected tropical diseases. We used frequency and percentages to present data; we also compared incidence data from both pilot and control locations. Findings: In total, 512 subjects submitted images, either themselves or via a community focal point. Their mean age was 53 years (standard deviation: 20.7). Forty-six percent (234/512) were women and 55% (281/512) were farmers. Notably, 43% (218/512) had experienced symptoms of neglected tropical diseases for 1-5 years before our study and 85% (437/512) had not received any intervention. Of all photos submitted, 75% (386/512) showed signs of neglected tropical diseases. In Ondo state crowdsourced surveillance led to an average of 54.3 monthly reports, versus traditional surveillance which averaged 6.8 ( Conclusion: Our surveillance method outperformed traditional surveillance, showing its promise for enhancing neglected tropical disease surveillance. The method's ability to detect emerging conditions and support post-elimination surveillance reinforces its value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.