Incorporating

Huan Zhong, Mengjie Wu, Wenli Tang, Pei Lei, Shouying Li, Fei Dang, Chengjun Li

Abstract readReview

In one paragraph

Review in Eco-Environment & Health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Huan ZhongState Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Green Resource Recycling, School of Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China.

Mengjie WuState Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Green Resource Recycling, School of Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China.

Wenli TangState Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Green Resource Recycling, School of Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China.

Pei LeiSchool of Environment, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China.

Shouying LiState Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Green Resource Recycling, School of Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China.

Fei DangState Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 211135, China.

Chengjun LiInstitute of Environmental Research at Greater Bay Area, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mercury pollution, in conjunction with other contaminants, hampers progress toward the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. The Minamata Convention on Mercury, which came into force in 2017, represents a critical step in combating this global issue. However, evaluating its effectiveness faces a major challenge, that is, establishing a clear link between reduced mercury emissions and lessened human exposure to neurotoxic methylmercury. Here, we propose that a previously overlooked methylmercury detoxification pathway in primary producers holds the potential to bridge the gaps in the emission-exposure nexus. A comprehensive understanding of this

Indexed as

DemethylationDetoxificationHgMeHgMethylationSDG

Identifiers

PMID41328169

DOI10.1016/j.eehl.2025.100199

PMCPMC12664964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC-ND

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.