Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41328146›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Triage Knowledge and Practice and Associated Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Nurse Triage in Tertiary Care Among Emergency Departments.

Reham Mostafa, Khaled El-Atawi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Reham MostafaEmergency Department, Saudi German Hospital, Dubai, ARE.
Khaled El-AtawiPediatrics/Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Latifa Women and Children Hospital, Dubai, ARE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEmergency essential services employ a triage approach to prioritize patients based on their clinical severity. The objective is to evaluate emergency department (ED) nurses' triage knowledge and practice by identifying factors influencing triage system accuracy. This involves assessing nurses' skills and understanding of triage procedures, potentially through surveys, observations, or performance evaluations, and examining how variables such as experience, training, and hospital type affect triage accuracy, which is essential for efficient and effective emergency care.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted from February 2024 to January 2025 on 300 nurses in the ED and 800 patients through a Google Forms questionnaire (Google, Inc., Mountain View, CA), distributed by email at different hospitals in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Data were gathered using a self-administered questionnaire that employed non-probability purposive sampling to assess sociodemographic data, triage knowledge, and accuracy.

resultsIn general, participants exhibited a high knowledge and triage practice level. Nonetheless, it was detected that there was an incorrect practice and a lack of knowledge in relation to certain aspects. According to the demographics of the participants, including qualification, gender, training, job title, and former triage training, there were insignificant differences in triage knowledge and practice (p > 0.05). Between triage knowledge and practice, there was a significant positive relationship (p < 0.01). It was observed that the average duration of accurate triage decisions was longer in patients with triage category 3.

conclusionsFindings revealed that emergency nurses had moderate levels of triage knowledge. While no statistically significant differences were found based on gender, job title, qualification, or additional training, nurses with more clinical experience showed higher triage accuracy, suggesting that experience may enhance performance.

Indexed as

accuracyemergency departmentknowledgenursespracticetriagetriage decision

Identifiers

PMID41328146
PMCPMC12665176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.