Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41328119›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Frailty as a Predictor of Outcomes in Optiflow.

Matthew Mort, Alwin Raju, Naina Mohan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew MortCardiology, Kingston Hospital, London, GBR.
Alwin RajuAcute Internal Medicine, Kingston Hospital, London, GBR.
Naina MohanAcute Internal Medicine, Kingston Hospital, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy has been increasingly used in acute settings for patients with hypoxic respiratory failure. More evidence is needed to identify which patients are more likely to benefit from HFNC over conventional oxygen therapy. There is limited published evidence regarding the impact of frailty on outcomes in patients treated with HFNC. Does a higher Clinical Frailty Score confer a worse outcome in those treated with HFNC? A retrospective cohort study of 96 patients who received HFNC was conducted at Kingston Hospital. Patients were divided into three groups based on their Clinical Frailty Score (CFS): CFS 1-4 (n=32), CFS 5-6 (n=44), and CFS 7-8 (n=20). Chi-squared test of independence was performed for significance in categorical variables, and for continuous variables, non-parametric testing using the Kruskal-Wallis H test was performed. The 30-day mortality in the CFS 7-8 group was found to be higher (55%) as opposed to the CFS 1-4 group (41%) and CFS 5-6 (55%) (p=0.48). Frail patients with a pneumonic process had a higher 30-day mortality rate than non-frail patients (8 of 12 or 75% of patients with CFS 7-8 p=0.034) and when compared to frail patients with non-pneumonic processes (2 of 7 or 29% of patients with CFS 7-8 p=0.18). Mortality in the hospital whilst receiving HFNC was higher in the frailer groups (CFS 5-6: 18 of 44 (41%); CFS 7-8: 6 of 20 (30%)) compared to the less frail group (CFS 1-4: 6 of 32 (19%)) (p=0.360). Our results suggest that frail patients experienced a higher mortality rate and lower weaning rate, particularly if the indication for HFNC was an underlying pneumonic process, suggesting that while HFNC provides benefits, its efficacy may be limited. Further evidence is needed to assess the efficacy of HFNC in frailty.

Indexed as

acute hypoxemic respiratory failurecare of the elderlyclinical frailtyhigh-flow nasal cannula (hfnc)mortalitypneumonia

Identifiers

PMID41328119
PMCPMC12665332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.