Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41328113›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Defining Breakfast in Dysphagia Care: Standards, Safety, and Nutrition.

Carlo Pedrolli

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Carlo PedrolliNutrition Department, Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, ITA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breakfast research typically emphasizes the consequences of skipping the meal rather than the benefits of regular intake, and key terms and metrics remain inconsistently defined. Definitions differ across countries and study designs, which complicates the implementation of recommendations and can materially change nutritional assessments, as illustrated by comparisons of two practical definitions applied to a hospital menu. Evidence for breakfast in clinical populations with dysphagia is limited, despite the high risk of malnutrition and the routine dilution of foods that lowers nutritional density. Recent hospital nutrition guidance mentions breakfast only briefly and provides little direction on composition, timing within the morning window, or texture. We therefore advocate clear, uniform definitions of breakfast; dysphagia-specific breakfast guidance with explicit energy and macronutrient targets, with particular attention to protein; adoption of the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative framework for food texture and liquid thickness; and a multidisciplinary approach involving dietitians, speech-language pathologists, and nurses to deliver safe swallowing alongside adequate nutrition.

Indexed as

breakfastcommunitydysphagiahospitalnursing home

Identifiers

PMID41328113
PMCPMC12665095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.