Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41328099›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Triggered Migraine Attack by Flickering Fluorescent Lights in an Assembly Line Worker: A Case Report.

Albert Gassull

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Albert GassullEmergency Medicine, Hospital Sant Joan de Reus, Tarragona, ESP.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migraine is a prevalent neurological disorder often exacerbated by environmental triggers, including visual stimuli like flickering lights, posing unique challenges in occupational settings such as factories. We describe a 32-year-old male assembly line worker with a history of episodic migraine without aura who experienced a sudden-onset unilateral headache, nausea, and photophobia while exposed to flickering fluorescent overhead lighting during a routine shift. He reported no recent alcohol or caffeine overuse, or medication changes, and denied trauma or infections. Clinical examination was unremarkable, with no neurological deficits, fever, or meningeal signs. The episode resolved completely within four hours after relocation to a quiet, darkened break area for rest, without pharmacological intervention. No diagnostic tests or imaging were pursued, given his established migraine diagnosis and clear temporal link to the trigger. Follow-up at one and three months confirmed no recurrence with workplace accommodations, including light filters and shift adjustments. This case highlights the role of artificial lighting as a preventable occupational trigger for migraine, emphasizing the need for environmental assessments in industrial environments to reduce absenteeism and improve worker well-being. Early recognition and simple modifications can avert acute attacks, underscoring occupational health's importance in managing chronic conditions like migraine.

Indexed as

case reportenvironmental triggerfactory workerflickering lightsheadacheknown diseasemigraineoccupational healthreversibletransient symptoms

Identifiers

PMID41328099
PMCPMC12665120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.