ArticleCureus2025
Triggered Migraine Attack by Flickering Fluorescent Lights in an Assembly Line Worker: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Migraine is a prevalent neurological disorder often exacerbated by environmental triggers, including visual stimuli like flickering lights, posing unique challenges in occupational settings such as factories. We describe a 32-year-old male assembly line worker with a history of episodic migraine without aura who experienced a sudden-onset unilateral headache, nausea, and photophobia while exposed to flickering fluorescent overhead lighting during a routine shift. He reported no recent alcohol or caffeine overuse, or medication changes, and denied trauma or infections. Clinical examination was unremarkable, with no neurological deficits, fever, or meningeal signs. The episode resolved completely within four hours after relocation to a quiet, darkened break area for rest, without pharmacological intervention. No diagnostic tests or imaging were pursued, given his established migraine diagnosis and clear temporal link to the trigger. Follow-up at one and three months confirmed no recurrence with workplace accommodations, including light filters and shift adjustments. This case highlights the role of artificial lighting as a preventable occupational trigger for migraine, emphasizing the need for environmental assessments in industrial environments to reduce absenteeism and improve worker well-being. Early recognition and simple modifications can avert acute attacks, underscoring occupational health's importance in managing chronic conditions like migraine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.