ArticleCureus2025
Hypersensitivity Reactions Associated With Aesthetic Botulinum Toxin A Injections: A Case Series.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dexamethasone Admixture for Hypersensitivity Prevention in Botulinum Toxin Type A Treatment: A Case Report.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Article
- An Unusual Iatrogenic Complication of Botulinum Toxin: Forearm Flexor Weakness Following a Nonstandard Intradermal Sensitivity Test.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) is commonly used in aesthetic treatments for indications such as moderate-to-severe glabellar frown lines. While generally considered safe and effective at low doses, hypersensitivity reactions, though extremely rare, can occur and may be clinically significant. We present three cases suggestive of hypersensitivity reactions to BoNT/A and discuss their potential mechanisms and clinical implications. In the first case, a 44-year-old woman developed severe angioedema after resuming abobotulinumtoxinA injections following a 12-month pause. Subsequent intradermal tests with onabotulinumtoxinA and incobotulinumtoxinA produced localized reactions, suggesting hypersensitivity to a shared component across formulations, possibly the 150 kDa BoNT/A neurotoxin itself. In the second case, a 38-year-old woman experienced delayed erythema and swelling after letibotulinumtoxinA treatment but tolerated subsequent incobotulinumtoxinA injections, suggesting possible reactivity to complexing proteins or other non-core components rather than the neurotoxin. In the third case, a 50-year-old woman developed systemic symptoms and localized swelling after prabotulinumtoxinA administration, consistent with a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction. These cases highlight the importance of considering patients' medical histories, prior BoNT/A exposures, and potential risk factors for hypersensitivity. Although rare, such reactions can range from localized effects to systemic manifestations. Possible allergens include the core neurotoxin, complexing proteins, excipients, or manufacturing contaminants. We discuss the potential immunological mechanisms underlying these reactions and emphasize that highly purified, low-immunogenicity formulations may be preferable, particularly for patients with prior allergic histories or prolonged treatment courses. Overall, this case series underscores the importance of clinical vigilance, appropriate patient selection, and awareness of rare but meaningful hypersensitivity reactions to BoNT/A in aesthetic practice. Routine reporting and further study are essential to improving patient safety and refining the risk profile of these widely used treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.