ArticleJMIR medical informatics2025
Gaps and Pathways to Success in Global Health Informatics Academic Collaborations: Reflecting on Current Practices.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sustainable artificial intelligence in global health: balancing promise, equity, and environmental realities in low- and middle-income countries.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Hepatitis B Research in Peru, 1988-2023: Geographic Inequities, Thematic Gaps, and Misalignment with Disease Burden.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Visualizing the Maternal Health Journey for Learning Health Systems: Mixed Methods Combined Experience Approach.Journal of participatory medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unlabelled: Academic global health informatics (GHI) projects are impactful collaborations between institutions in high-income and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and play a crucial role in enhancing health care services and access in LMICs using eHealth practices. Researchers across all involved organizations bring unique expertise to these collaborations. However, these projects often face significant obstacles, including cultural and linguistic barriers, resource limitations, and sustainability issues. The lack of representation from LMIC researchers in knowledge generation and the high costs of open-access publications further complicate efforts to ensure inclusive, accessible, and collaborative scholarship. This viewpoint describes present gaps in the literature on academic GHI collaborations and describes a path forward for future research directions and successful research community development. Key recommendations include centering community-based participatory research, developing post-growth solutions, and creating sustainable funding models. Addressing these challenges is essential for fostering effective, scalable, and equitable GHI interventions that improve global health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.