ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2025
Elevated Pre-Pregnancy Blood Pressure and the Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Evidence From a Nationwide Population-Based Study.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and women's health throughout the life course: an update review 2025-2026.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Review
- Pre-Pregnancy Physical Activity Lowers Risk of Diet-Controlled but Not Insulin-Treated Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Korean Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of Korean medical science · 2026Article
- Racial/ethnic disparities in stages of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome among reproductive-aged women in the United States: NHANES 2011-2020.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPre-pregnancy blood pressure (BP) has gained attention as a potential predictor of adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, data on the impact of mildly elevated BP, particularly in women without overt hypertension, remain limited. In this study, we aimed to examine the association between pre-pregnancy BP and adverse pregnancy outcomes in women without a history of hypertension.
methodsIn this retrospective nationwide study, we included pregnant women with pre-pregnancy BP below 140/90 mmHg and no prior diagnosis of hypertension. Participants were categorized based on their pre-pregnancy BP into the normal BP (< 120/80 mmHg), elevated BP (120-129 and < 80 mmHg), and stage 1 hypertension (130-139 or 80-89 mmHg) groups. The following adverse pregnancy outcomes were recorded: preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, placental abruption, postpartum hemorrhage, preterm birth, and small or large for gestational age. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the associations between pre-pregnancy BP categories and adverse pregnancy outcomes.
resultsAmong 298,433 women, 76.9% had normal BP, 8.7% had elevated BP, and 14.3% had stage 1 hypertension. The incidence of adverse outcomes significantly increased in groups with higher BP (normal BP, 24.8%; elevated BP, 27.1%, and stage 1 hypertension, 29.9%;
conclusionEven modest increases in pre-pregnancy BP below the clinical threshold for hypertension were associated with a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. These findings highlight the need for early BP monitoring and management before pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.