Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41327403›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2025

Membrane flex loop-assisted peeling and giant flap creation for primary repair of idiopathic macular holes: a pilot study.

Rodrigo Jorge, Victor Bellanda, Arthur S Zupelli, Moises Moura de Lucena, Letícia O Audi, Ingrid U Scott, Antonio Marcelo Barbante Casella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rodrigo Jorge *Ophthalmology Division, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, 3900 Bandeirantes Ave., Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14049 - 900, Brazil. rjorge@fmrp.usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2652-0720
Victor Bellanda *Ophthalmology Division, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, 3900 Bandeirantes Ave., Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14049 - 900, Brazil.
Arthur S Zupelli *Ophthalmology Division, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, 3900 Bandeirantes Ave., Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14049 - 900, Brazil.
Moises Moura de LucenaOphthalmology Division, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, 3900 Bandeirantes Ave., Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14049 - 900, Brazil.
Letícia O AudiOphthalmology Division, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, 3900 Bandeirantes Ave., Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14049 - 900, Brazil.
Ingrid U ScottDepartments of Ophthalmology and Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Antonio Marcelo Barbante CasellaDepartment of Surgery, Londrina State University, Londrina, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4552-2799

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdiopathic macular holes are commonly treated with pars plana vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, which achieves high closure rates in smaller holes but is less effective for large or chronic cases. Alternative techniques, such as inverted or free flaps, may improve outcomes but often involve forceps manipulation, which can damage retinal tissue. The membrane loop device (FINESSE® Flex Loop; Alcon), designed for atraumatic manipulation of the ILM, has not been evaluated for giant flap creation. This study reports the anatomical and functional outcomes of macular hole repair using a giant ILM flap created exclusively with the membrane loop.

methodsThis prospective, single-arm interventional case series included patients with large (minimal linear diameter > 400 μm) or chronic (≥ 6 months) idiopathic macular holes. All underwent standard 25-gauge vitrectomy with creation of a 2–3 mm ILM flap using the membrane loop without forceps. The primary endpoint was anatomical closure at day 14. Secondary outcomes included change in best-corrected visual acuity (ETDRS letters), proportion of eyes gaining ≥ 15 letters, and need for reoperation over six months.

resultsEight eyes from eight patients (median age, 69 years; range, 45–77) were enrolled. Baseline median minimal linear diameter was 400 μm, and median symptom duration was 11 months. Six of eight holes (75%) were closed after primary surgery, although one recurred after two months. The two eyes that were refractory and the one that recurred subsequently achieved closure after reoperation, resulting in a final closure rate of 100% at six months. Median visual acuity improved from 20 to 55 letters, corresponding to a gain of 33 letters (95% CI, + 5 to + 48; P = 0.018). Six eyes (75%) gained at least 15 letters, and no intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred.

conclusionsMembrane loop-assisted giant ILM flap creation yielded a 75% primary and 100% final macular hole closure rate after reoperation, with consistent visual improvement in this pilot series of patients with large or chronic idiopathic macular holes. By minimizing retinal trauma and eliminating the need for forceps, this technique may represent a safe and effective surgical alternative. Larger, comparative studies are warranted to confirm these preliminary results, elucidate long-term anatomical and functional outcomes, and objectively quantify potential differences in retinal trauma relative to traditional forceps-assisted flap techniques.

Indexed as

Internal limiting membraneMacular holeMembrane loopRetinal surgeryVitrectomy

Identifiers

PMID41327403
PMCPMC12777450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.