Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41327402›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

Investigate the therapeutic differences between temporal interference stimulation and transcranial alternating current stimulation on post-stroke cognitive dysfunction: a protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Dilinuer Maimaitiaili, Xiaolong Shi, Jiali Wu, Meng Ren, Qian Zhang, Sicong Zhang, Yuanli Li, Chunlei Shan

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dilinuer Maimaitiaili *School of Rehabilitation Science, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2800-783X
Xiaolong Shi *School of Rehabilitation Science, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China.
Jiali WuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200336, China.
Meng RenSchool of Rehabilitation Science, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China.
Qian ZhangSchool of Rehabilitation Science, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China.
Sicong ZhangYueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hongkou District, 110 Ganhe Road, Shanghai, 200437, China.
Yuanli LiEngineering Research Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine Intelligent Rehabilitation, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, 201023, China. liyuan218@126.com.
Chunlei ShanSchool of Rehabilitation Science, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China. shanclhappy@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No. 82272612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTranscranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and temporal interference stimulation (TIS) as electrical neuromodulation therapy have shown promising applications in cognitive impairments. Meanwhile, the TIS technique is more novel, with deep and non-invasive brain stimulation. At present, the therapeutic or neuromodulation differences between TIS and tACS on post-stroke cognitive dysfunction(PSCI) are still unclear. Here, we aim to compare and analyze the neuromodulation model and clinical performances of TIS and tACS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The prospective, single-blind and randomized controlled trial will be conducted over a 2-week period. Through precise statistical sample size calculation,thirty-six eligible participants with mild PSCI will be recruited and randomly allocated to either the tACS or the TIS group. Participants in the TIS group will receive stimulation at frequencies of 2005 Hz and 2010 Hz targeting the hippocampal region. Those in the tACS group will undergo 5 Hz stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). The intervention will last for 2 weeks, with each participant receiving 25-min stimulation sessions once a day, five times per week. The primary outcome measure will be the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), while secondary outcomes will include performance on the N-back task, digital span test (DST), shape trails test (STT) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). All clinical assessments will be collected at two time points: pre-intervention (T1) and post-intervention (T2).

trial registrationThe trial protocol is registered with www.chictr.org.cn under protocol registration number ChiCTR2400081207. Registered on February 26, 2024.

Indexed as

CognitionCognitive DysfunctionStrokeStroke RehabilitationTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultAgedDorsolateral Prefrontal CortexFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodTime FactorsFunctional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI)Randomized controlled trialTemporal interference stimulation (TIS)Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)

Identifiers

PMID41327402
PMCPMC12777288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.