ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
Effects of different heavy sled loads sprint training on acceleration performance in adolescent sprinters.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSled sprint training to improve athletes' sprint performance is becoming increasingly popular. However, there is still no consensus on the appropriate resistance to improve acceleration, and few studies have focused on adolescent sprinters. This study aimed to investigate the effects of 8 weeks of different heavy-load sled sprint training on acceleration performance and kinematics in adolescent sprinters.
methodsThirty-two adolescent sprinters were assigned to four groups: three resisted groups (25%, 40%, and 50% body mass [BM]; n = 8 each) and one non-resisted group (NRS; n = 8). Participants trained twice weekly for 8 weeks. Pre- and post-training assessments included 30 m and 60 m sprint performance and kinematic parameters (step length, step frequency, contact time, flight time, trunk angle, push-off angle, shin angle, and hip angular velocity).
resultsFor sprint performance, within-group improvements were significant in 30 m for 40% and 50% BM groups and in 60 m for 25% BM group (p < 0.05). Between-group comparisons showed greater 30 m improvements in 40% and 50% BM groups compared to NRS group (p < 0.05). In terms of sprint kinematics, within-group improvements were significant for step length (0-30 m) and step frequency (10-20 m) across all resisted groups, and for trunk angle (toe-off) (0-20 m) and push-off angle (10-20 m) in the 40% and 50% BM groups. Between-group comparisons showed significantly greater trunk angle (10-20 m) in 40% and 50% BM groups compared to NRS group (p < 0.05).
conclusionsThese results indicate that heavier sled training (40% and 50% BM) was more effective in enhancing speed, trunk angle, and step length in acceleration, whereas lighter sled training (25% BM) benefited 60 m sprint performance. This study highlights how different training loads impact sprint performance, providing coaches with insights into kinematic changes following prolonged training and aiding in the optimization of sprint training programs for adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.