ArticleBMC psychology2025
Coping strategies among poverty-affected adolescents experiencing or at risk of depression and anxiety in Nepal: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring the role of resilience in selective prevention intervention for adolescents at risk of depression and anxiety in Nepal: findings from a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAdolescents employ various coping strategies to manage stress, which can impact their short and long-term mental health. Economically disadvantaged adolescents are more prone to developing maladaptive coping mechanisms due to the persistent stressors associated with poverty. In Nepal, there is a lack of research on how adolescents experiencing or at risk of depression and anxiety cope with adverse situations. This study aims to explore how adolescents affected by poverty and at risk of experiencing mental health problems navigate difficulties within their homes, peer groups, and school environments.
methodsThe study focused on adolescents aged 11 to 19 residing in informal squatter settlements in Kathmandu, Nepal. In-depth narrative interviews were conducted with 30 adolescents experiencing or at risk of depression and/or anxiety. In addition, journal entries documenting their experiences were collected weekly for 3–5 weeks post-interviews. Thematic and plot analysis were employed to identify the coping strategies utilised by adolescents in this context, which were then categorised according to coping theory.
resultsThe results indicated that adolescents employed a combination of adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies across different settings (home, school, and peer interactions), with variation in coping strategies used within each setting. Problem solving emerged as the most prevalent coping strategy across all settings. Adolescents tended to exhibit more submission and helplessness at home, more isolation and opposition among peers, and more accommodation and opposition at school. Adolescents aged 14–16 displayed more maladaptive coping strategies compared to younger (11 to 13 years) and older adolescents (17 to 19 years). While girls and boys utilised similar adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies, girls leaned more towards avoidance-escape and helplessness, whereas boys favoured opposition and isolation.
conclusionThe results highlight the range of adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies used by adolescents to manage stress in circumstances of urban poverty in Nepal. The study recommends focused psychological interventions which equip adolescents with adaptive coping strategies and stress appraisal techniques that help them manage difficulties effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.