ArticleBMC nursing2025
Perception of simulation-based training as a replacement for clinical practice training among pre-licensure nursing students: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mapping the complexity of psychomotor skills in core nursing procedures: A content analysis for simulation-based education.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the increasing adoption of simulation during clinical training disruptions, little is known about how students perceive its ability to replace clinical placements. This study aims to explore the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of final-year pre-licensure nursing students regarding simulation-based training as a substitution for clinical practice.
methodsThis study adopted an exploratory qualitative design with face-to-face focus group interviews. Two accident and emergency case scenarios involving tachycardia and drug overdose were developed and simulated in the simulation wards of the participating nursing institution to substitute for clinical practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. We recruited a total of 40 final-year pre-licensure nursing students (80% female) enrolled in both bachelor’s (n = 20) and master’s programs (n = 20) in a government-funded public university in Hong Kong to participate in focus group interviews via convenience sampling until data saturation was reached. All interviews were audio-recorded and moderated by nurse instructors using a pre-determined interview guide. Qualitative data were subjected to thematic analysis.
resultsA total of eight focus group interviews were conducted. Three themes emerged from the qualitative data: (i) effective preparation for clinical practice, (ii) the limitations of simulation-based training in replacing clinical practice and (iii) refining simulation-based training. All students recognised that the simulation-based training helped to bridge the gap between theory and practice and to improve their case management, communication, clinical decision-making and nursing skills. However, limitations concerning the differences in procedures and facilities not reflective of the most current practices and challenges in replicating certain aspects of clinical placement (such as clinical atmosphere, patient variety and complexity) hindered the ability of simulation-based training to fully replace clinical practice.
conclusionThe study findings demonstrate the potential use of simulation-based training to complement clinical practice in pre-licensure nursing education in Hong Kong. To further refine the training programme, it is recommended to enhance the briefing, develop more complex and diverse case scenarios to better replicate clinical situations and upgrade the laboratory facilities to include more realistic equipment. Further research should explore the potential use of this training modality in other speciality areas and broader variety of institutions using a longitudinal design. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.