ArticleDiagnostic pathology2025
Usefulness of BRG1 immunostaining in detecting SMARCA4 deficiency in "so-called" cancers of unknown primary in daily pathology practice.
Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSMARCA4 encodes BRG1, loss of which is associated with aggressive tumor biology. Although SMARCA4 deficiency has been described in various malignancies, its role in “so-called” cancers of unknown primary (“so-called” CUP), that is, metastatic tumors encountered in pathology practice without a clear primary site, remains unclear.
methodsWe retrospectively studied 108 cases submitted as so-called “CUP” between 2017 and 2023, in which the primary site could not be determined at the time of diagnosis. Histological features and BRG1 immunohistochemistry were reviewed. BRG1 loss was defined as complete absence of nuclear staining in tumor cells. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) was performed in selected cases with sufficient residual tissue. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) ≥ 10 mutations/Mb was defined as TMB-high.
resultsBRG1 loss was observed in 13 tumors (12%). BRG1-loss tumors were significantly more likely to involve the thoracic cavity (85% vs. 36%; p < 0.001) and exhibited prominent necrosis, higher mitotic counts, and nuclear inclusions compared with BRG1-preserved tumors. All nine BRG1-loss tumors tested by CGP harbored pathogenic SMARCA4 mutations, and 78% (7/9 cases) were TMB-high compared with 14% (1/7 cases) of BRG1-preserved tumors. PD-L1 positivity was detected in one of 11 BRG1-loss cases tested. Other mutations observed in BRG-1 loss tumors were not distinctive enough to indicate the primary site.
conclusionsBRG1 immunostaining is a sensitive surrogate of SMARCA4 deficiency in “so-called” CUP. Although BRG1 status does not reliably identify the site of origin, it highlights tumors enriched for thoracic involvement and TMB-high status. These findings support the use of BRG1 as a practical screening tool to select cases for further genomic testing and therapeutic stratification, including potential consideration of immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.