ArticleBMC health services research2025
Stakeholder barriers and facilitators to mental health service integration: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Structural and health system determinants of mental health in Tanzania: mapping policy recommendations to the WHO comprehensive mental health action plan 2013-2030.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AIMS AND
objectivesWe aimed to determine the organisational and systemic barriers and facilitators to achieving mental health service integration in a region of the State of Victoria, Australia.
backgroundA consensus definition for mental health service integration is lacking, with literature referring to the 'joining up' of mental healthcare and physical healthcare to achieve more holistic care that is focussed on the needs of the consumer. There have been several attempts at integrating mental health services with various healthcare providers, with varying results.
designQualitative interviews conducted with key stakeholders were analysed using the Theoretical Domains Framework, an implementation science framework designed to identify influences on behaviour relating to the implementation of evidence in healthcare.
methodsIn consultation with a local agency with deep knowledge of mental health service delivery in the region, we recruited stakeholders with extensive experience and knowledge of mental health services; these stakeholders included clinical managers, senior clinicians and leaders of mental health service consumer groups. The interview guide was aligned with the Theoretical Domains Framework. Semi-structured audio-recorded interviews were conducted with stakeholders, and data were analysed according to the Theoretical Domains Framework domains.
findingsFrom interviews with 16 stakeholders, several barriers to mental health service integration in the region were identified, including workforce capability, funding arrangements and stigma towards some consumers of mental health services. Conversely, several facilitators were identified that could aid in service integration being implemented, including worker and clinician commitment to patient-centred care principles and the ability to provide the right care at the right time.
conclusionsAlthough there is good evidence for service integration as an overarching model of mental health service delivery, implementation in some regions has been hampered by extensive barriers. This paper provides recommended strategies to overcome barriers, in addition to facilitators that could be leveraged to achieve mental health service integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.