Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41327256›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

The effectiveness of digital media in improving menstrual hygiene knowledge among adolescent girls: a study in junior high schools in Bandung regency.

Fahmi Fuadah, Gurdani Yogisutanti, Berlyna D Saragih

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fahmi FuadahImmanuel Institute of Health, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia. bungsu.fahmi05@gmail.com.
Gurdani YogisutantiImmanuel Institute of Health, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.
Berlyna D SaragihImmanuel Institute of Health, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMenstrual hygiene management is a critical aspect of adolescent girls' health, yet knowledge gaps remain in many developing countries, including Indonesia. With the increasing use of digital media among adolescents, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of digital electronic media in improving menstrual hygiene knowledge among adolescent girls in junior high schools in Bandung Regency.

methodsA quasi-experimental design was used involving 180 adolescent girls from six junior was used. The intervention group received validated educational content on menstrual hygiene through digital electronic media, including an animated video and an interactive booklet. The control group followed traditional educational methods. Knowledge was assessed using a 25-item validated questionnaire (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.81) through a pre-test and post-test format. Statistical analysis included Difference-in-Differences (DiD), paired and independent t-tests, and Mann–Whitney U tests.

findingsThere was a significant improvement in menstrual hygiene knowledge in the intervention group compared to the control group (mean DiD effect: 12.5 points; 95% CI: 10.2–14.7; p < 0.001). Public school students exhibited more pronounced improvements. Key areas of knowledge gain were hygiene practices and myth correction.

interpretationDigital media effectively enhances adolescent girls' menstrual hygiene knowledge and attitudes. This approach is scalable and cost-efficient, particularly for low-resource settings.

fundingInstitut Kesehatan Immanuel.

Indexed as

Digital MediaHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHygieneMenstruationAdolescentFemaleHumansIndonesiaSchoolsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescent girlsDigital mediaHealth educationJunior high schoolsMenstrual hygiene

Identifiers

PMID41327256
PMCPMC12777354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.