Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41327246›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Detection of flawed multiple-choice questions in preclinical medical education using item difficulty and discrimination indices: a six-year analysis.

Varanya Srisomsak, Chantacha Sitticharoon, Issarawan Keadkraichaiwat, Sunan Meethes, Inpreeya Inpaen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Varanya SrisomsakDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Rd., Siriraj, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, Thailand, 10700.
Chantacha SitticharoonDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Rd., Siriraj, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, Thailand, 10700. chantacha.sit@mahidol.ac.th.
Issarawan KeadkraichaiwatDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Rd., Siriraj, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, Thailand, 10700.
Sunan MeethesEducation department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Rd., Siriraj, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, Thailand, 10700.
Inpreeya InpaenDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Rd., Siriraj, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, Thailand, 10700.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMCQ exams may include flawed items affecting validity. Psychometric indicators such as item difficulty (p-value) and point-biserial coefficient (r

methodsExam analyses from 32 preclinical courses (academic years 2017-2022) were reviewed. Items meeting predefined thresholds were flagged, while all items were manually reviewed when the most frequently chosen answer was not the keyed correct answer or when multiple options had similar p-values. Flagged items were sent to course directors for verification, and only confirmed items were recorded as corrections.

resultsAmong 236 exams, 59 (25.0%) required corrections, with at least 1 corrected item. Of 14,238 total items, 81 (0.6%) required correction, most due to 'multiple-answers' (46.9%), followed by 'wrong-answer' (40.7%), awarding points to all choices ('all-choices') (7.4%), and 'item-removal' (4.9%) causes. Of 77 corrected items with available p- and r

conclusionWhile p- and/or r

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsAnalysisExamExam thresholdItem difficultyPoint biserial coefficient

Identifiers

PMID41327246
PMCPMC12805726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.