ArticleBMC medical education2025
Comparing the effectiveness of in-person and synchronous virtually online for cambodia's rehabilitation health workforce.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe study aimed to analyze the differences in learning satisfaction between in-person and synchronous virtually online among Cambodian trainees in the Dr. LEE Jong-wook Fellowship Program. Given the necessity to strengthen health workforce capacity in developing countries, this study provides insights into the effectiveness of training delivery modes to improve rehabilitation healthcare personnel training.
methodsA quantitative study was conducted to evaluate learning satisfaction, incorporating both structured survey responses and anecdotal comments from open-ended questions. The study employed a validated learning satisfaction tool, adjusted for reliability and validity. In the in-person training sessions, data were collected through paper-based surveys, while in the synchronous virtual online training sessions, an online version of the same survey using a 5-point Likert scale was administered. Study participants were selected using convenience sampling.
resultsTwenty-one participants (male, n = 12; female, n = 9) met the inclusion criteria. Among the 21 participants, 17 (81%) were affiliated with the Khmer-Soviet Friendship Hospital. Additionally, 61% were physical therapists, 14% were medical doctors (n = 3), and 24% were registered nurses (n = 5). Furthermore, 55% had at least 10 years of experience. The findings indicated higher satisfaction in in-person, attributed to increased interaction and real-time feedback(Q4: t = 2.413, p = .021; Q10: t = 3.285, p = .002). However, synchronous virtually online was preferred by trainees for its flexibility. Additionally, conducting the program in the Cambodian native language considerably enhanced trainee satisfaction.
conclusionsThis study highlights the strengths and limitations of different educational delivery methods in healthcare workforce training. It suggests that a hybrid approach, incorporating both in-person and synchronous virtually online in trainees' native language, may optimize learning satisfaction and engagement in future programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.