ArticleBMC public health2025
Heavy metal mixtures exposure and breast cancer risk: synergistic effects with SHBG identified by mediation and moderation models.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEnvironmental heavy metal exposure and endogenous sex hormones are implicated in breast cancer (BC) etiology, but their combined effects remain incompletely characterized. This study aimed to investigate the associations between blood heavy metals and BC risk, while examining the potential mediating role of sex hormones and their interaction effects.
methodsWe analyzed data from 2,939 female participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013-2020. Multivariable logistic regression, weighted quantile sum (WQS) regression, quantile g-computation (Qgcomp), and Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) models were employed to examine the independent and combined associations of 5 blood metals-lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), selenium (Se), and manganese (Mn)-with BC risk. Nonlinear relationships were evaluated using restricted cubic splines (RCS). Mediation and moderation analyses were conducted to elucidate the mechanistic role of sex hormones in heavy metal-associated BC risk.
resultsIn the single-exposure models, the fully adjusted analysis results revealed significant positive associations for blood Pb (OR = 2.71, 95% CI = 2.22-3.30) and Hg (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.12-1.61), a negative association for Mn (OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.70-0.99), while non-significant associations for Cd (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.98-1.39) and Se (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.90-1.27). RCS analyses revealed linear dose-response relationships for Pb and Hg (P non-linear > 0.05), but significant nonlinear relationships for Cd and Mn (P over < 0.001, P non-linear < 0.05). In mixture analyses, multi-metal exposure significantly increased BC risk (WQS: OR = 1.43; Qgcomp: OR = 1.28; both P < 0.001), with BKMR models confirming consistent associations. Pb emerged as the primary contributor across all mixture models. Both single and mixture metal exposures showed significant positive associations with sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). Each unit increase in SHBG elevated BC risk by 1.65-fold (P < 0.001), demonstrating a linear dose-response. Mediation analysis indicated significant masking effects for SHBG in the metal-BC risk pathway, and moderation analysis further revealed that the interaction between blood heavy metals and SHBG synergistically amplified BC risk.
conclusionHeavy metal exposure (particularly Pb) is associated with increased BC risk, potentially through SHBG upregulation and synergistic interactions, while Mn examines inverse associations. These findings highlight a potential link between environmental metals and hormone-related BC risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.