ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Early atraumatic recurrent dislocation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty despite optimal implant positioning: two case reports.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPostoperative instability following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is one of the most common complications and remains a significant clinical challenge. Although implant positioning, design, and surgical technique are known to influence stability, there is no universally accepted management strategy when dislocation recurs. This study reports two rare cases of early, atraumatic recurrent dislocation after RTSA, highlighting the complexity of this complication. METHODS AND
resultsBetween 2014 and 2023, 182 reverse total shoulder arthroplasties (RTSAs) were performed at our institution by a single surgeon using a consistent technique. We retrospectively identified two patients who developed recurrent dislocation. One patient underwent RTSA for an acute proximal humerus fracture, and the other for fracture malunion. Dislocation occurred at 2 and 3 weeks postoperatively, respectively, without any traumatic event. Both cases required operative reduction, as closed reduction in the emergency setting was unsuccessful. Despite upsizing to a thicker polyethylene liner, instability persisted. Ultimately, open reduction followed by immobilization in an abduction brace for six weeks was performed. During follow-up, no further dislocations occurred, and both patients retained their prosthesis with acceptable functional outcomes.
conclusionEarly recurrent dislocation can occur despite correct implant orientation and satisfactory intraoperative stability testing. In such cases, open reduction followed by prolonged immobilization may offer a viable option to avoid revision or resection arthroplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.