Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41327194›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Encounters in the Swedish health and welfare sector: experiences of people identifying as LGBTQ.

Heléne Appelgren Engström, Anna-Lena Almqvist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Heléne Appelgren EngströmSchool of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden. helene.appelgren.engstrom@mdu.se.
Anna-Lena AlmqvistFaculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople identifying as LGBTQ + experience challenges when encountering the health and welfare sector. They experience heteronormativity and discrimination even though the health and welfare sector should value everyone equally and counteract discrimination. Research about the health and wellbeing of people identifying as LGBTQ + is mostly conducted in North America, and less research is conducted in Sweden; therefore, this study seeks to explore encounters with professionals in the health and welfare sector experienced by people identifying as LGBTQ+.

methodsThis study used a qualitative method involving 22 persons identifying as LGBTQ+. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted, and data was analysed with content analysis.

resultsThe main category, Varying encounters in the health and welfare sector, includes the two generic categories, Caring encounters and Uncaring encounters. Caring encounters include three sub-categories: Welcoming environment, Respectfulness and Competent professionals. Uncaring encounters includes three sub-categories: Heteronormative assumptions, Intimidating behaviours, and Experiences of discrimination.

conclusionsProfessionals in the health and welfare sector need to demonstrate that they support inclusion by having LGBTQ + competence and knowledge. More effort is needed to encourage professionals in the health and welfare sector to understand individuals identifying as LGBTQ+. Professionals need to be given the prerequisites to develop guidelines for caring encounters and competence in using inclusive language.

Indexed as

Sexual and Gender MinoritiesSocial WelfareAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSwedenCaring encountersExperiencesHealthcareLGBTQ+Uncaring encountersWelfare sector

Identifiers

PMID41327194
PMCPMC12754928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.