ArticleBMC medical education2025
Designing a virtual learning framework in medical education: lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Professionalism and mental health in medical and nursing students under prolonged virtual learning: a longitudinal study in Peru.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted all aspects of human life, including education. Medical universities faced various challenges, including the need for virtual education and changes in educational systems, and were forced to adapt their teaching methods. The goal of this study is to explore the lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic in educating medical students and to design a virtual education framework at Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
methodsThis is a sequential exploratory mixed-method study, consisting of qualitative and quantitative phases. In the qualitative phase, in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 25 faculty members from Tehran University of Medical Sciences. In the so-called "quantitative" phase, a literature review and expert panel were employed; these methods are not inherently quantitative (i.e., they do not involve statistical analysis of numerical data). It is recommended to replace the term "quantitative" with a more accurate descriptor, such as "literature synthesis and expert consensus," or describe this phase differently. The findings from both phases were subsequently used to design the virtual education framework.
resultsThe study revealed that using modern technologies for virtual education in medical universities is crucial and requires strengthening infrastructure. Furthermore, clinical education in a virtual format presents significant challenges and the need for developing blended learning methods. Ultimately, the virtual education framework at Tehran University of Medical Sciences was designed and developed. The virtual education system formulated here focuses on three pillars: infrastructure development, faculty empowerment, and establishing blended learning practices. A short description of the pillars here provides readers with a clearer sense of the framework's structure and priorities.
conclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic provided an opportunity to assess and improve virtual education at medical universities. Given the successes achieved, it is essential to develop the infrastructure for virtual education and establish clear standards for it so that blended and electronic education can be implemented more effectively alongside in-person education in the future. To address the challenges in clinical education highlighted by the study, implementing blended learning approaches emerges as a key strategy for improving virtual and in-person medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.